Press key "Tab" on the keyboard.mohsen wrote:1- Environment editor software is capable AutoComplete, but when writing code, it opens the list can not be selected with the keyboard is one of them. Please add this feature in the new version.
Several requests
-
User_Russian
- Addict
- Posts: 1520
- Joined: Wed Nov 12, 2008 5:01 pm
- Location: Russia
Re: Several requests
Re: Several requests
1. Use the TAB-Key
2. And?
3. Most users have written itself!
4. WebGadget?
5. WebGadget?
6. CanvasGadget?
7. http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =3&t=47499
8. http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =3&t=55725
9. and || for Abs() function ^^
2. And?
3. Most users have written itself!
4. WebGadget?
5. WebGadget?
6. CanvasGadget?
7. http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =3&t=47499
8. http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =3&t=55725
9. and || for Abs() function ^^
PB 6.01 ― Win 10, 21H2 ― Ryzen 9 3900X, 32 GB ― NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ― Vivaldi 6.0 ― www.unionbytes.de
Lizard - Script language for symbolic calculations and more ― Typeface - Sprite-based font include/module
Lizard - Script language for symbolic calculations and more ― Typeface - Sprite-based font include/module
Re: Several requests
7. static libraries -> http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... =3&t=30342
"Have you tried turning it off and on again ?"
A little PureBasic review
A little PureBasic review
Re: Several requests
1. I use the Enter/Return key.
Change in Preferences - Shortcuts - Insert the selected AutoComplete word = [Return]
9. ^ operator would be nice, but the Pow() function does exist.
Change in Preferences - Shortcuts - Insert the selected AutoComplete word = [Return]
9. ^ operator would be nice, but the Pow() function does exist.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
-
IdeasVacuum
- Always Here
- Posts: 6426
- Joined: Fri Oct 23, 2009 2:33 am
- Location: Wales, UK
- Contact:
Re: Several requests
I think it is perfectly adequate, it is functional and easy to use. It certainly isn't ugly! VS has a lot of idiosyncrasies of it's own but at the end of the day, you can't please all of the developers all of the time.2-This object is not user friendly at all, I think the object is needed, such as VS 2010 interface.
IdeasVacuum
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
If it sounds simple, you have not grasped the complexity.
Re: Several requests
I guess your last sentence is true, I thought that was the best way to deal with so many properties at once, and it seems to do the job for most that use the form designerIdeasVacuum wrote:I think it is perfectly adequate, it is functional and easy to use. It certainly isn't ugly! VS has a lot of idiosyncrasies of it's own but at the end of the day, you can't please all of the developers all of the time.2-This object is not user friendly at all, I think the object is needed, such as VS 2010 interface.
