PB 5.11 assembler and local labels

[User_Russian]

Why assembler preprocessor, not work correctly with a local label?

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  EnableASM
  
  jmp m1
  
  m1:
EndProcedure

We have to explicitly specify the name of the label.

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  EnableASM
  
  jmp l_test_m1
  
  m1:
EndProcedure

[STARGÅTE]

Label: is a PB-Syntax, use the ASM Syntax:

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  EnableASM
  
  jmp m1
  
  !m1:
EndProcedure

[User_Russian]

STARGÅTE, In the case of a variable, do not use ASM-syntax.

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  x=0
  EnableASM
  mov x, 10
  DisableASM
  
  Debug x
EndProcedure

Test()

Then why is he (ASM-syntax) is required in the case of the labels?
Obviously flaw, ASM preprocessor.

[Demivec]

Test()[/code]Then why is he (ASM-syntax) is required in the case of the labels?
Obviously flaw, ASM preprocessor.

The variable or label has to be declared first. In your example code declared the variable 'x' by using it before the assembler code, but the label was declared after the assembler code.

Not a bug. Same as your other bug report. Read the information in the manual on assembly use or post in the Assembly Programming or Coding Questions forum if you have a question on use.

[User_Russian]

The variable or label has to be declared first.

It does not matter.
Still does not work.

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  EnableASM
  m1:
  
  jmp m1
  DisableASM
  
EndProcedure

Test()

[Demivec]

We have to explicitly specify the name of the label.

Code: Select all

Procedure Test()
  EnableASM
  
  jmp l_test_m1
  
  m1:
EndProcedure

You already know how to do it correctly, why are you confused? Are you trying to make a feature request instead of a bug report?

[LuCiFeR[SD]]

I'm pretty convinced he doesn't understand that the "!" bypasses the PBcompiler and gives him the access to fasm directly. but equally, I don't think he understands that there is a possibility of his label clashing with a pb internal label and giving him just as many headaches when code that should work, suddenly doesn't. which is why PB's procedural syntax requires the "l_test_m1"

but yes, it does sound more like a feature request than a bug

[User_Russian]

Friends, this ASM code handles preprocessor pbcompiler, before it processes the fasm.
And this preprocessor should change the name of the label, as it does with the variable names.
After all, the preprocessor replaces

Code: Select all

mov x, 10

on

Code: Select all

mov dword [p.v_x], 10

Why can not he do the same with the labels?

[LuCiFeR[SD]]

then make this a feature request and NOT a bug report, because it is not a bug as is explained in the documentation.