For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
DoctorLove
User
Posts: 85 Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:55 pm
Post
by DoctorLove » Sun Dec 23, 2012 3:22 pm
Just an idea!
As the langauge and ide becomes more pro, why not a brand new name with it?
Maybe for version 6?
Probasic 6
It was pure, now its pro
MachineCode
Addict
Posts: 1482 Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:16 pm
Post
by MachineCode » Sun Dec 23, 2012 3:40 pm
That would ruin all marketing, links, reviews, customer recognition, brand awareness, and so on. Basically, it'd make PureBasic dead and nobody would use ProBasic because it's a "new" language. Not gonna happen.
Microsoft Visual Basic only lasted 7 short years: 1991 to 1998.
PureBasic: Born in 1998 and still going strong to this very day!
luis
Addict
Posts: 3895 Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Italy
Post
by luis » Sun Dec 23, 2012 4:12 pm
I would call it Assurbanipal or Nabucodonosor.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again ?"
Demivec
Addict
Posts: 4269 Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Utah, USA
Post
by Demivec » Sun Dec 23, 2012 4:34 pm
I would call it Pabasical or Superb.
djes
Addict
Posts: 1806 Joined: Sat Feb 19, 2005 2:46 pm
Location: Pas-de-Calais, France
Post
by djes » Sun Dec 23, 2012 7:44 pm
PureBasic already means Professionals Understimates Real Efficiency of the Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code
deeproot
Enthusiast
Posts: 284 Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 12:00 pm
Location: Llangadog, Wales, UK
Contact:
Post
by deeproot » Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:37 pm
djes wrote: PureBasic already means Professionals Understimates Real Efficiency of the Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code
Magnifique!
ts-soft
Always Here
Posts: 5756 Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Berlin - Germany
Post
by ts-soft » Sun Dec 23, 2012 8:53 pm
I would call it: Back2Basic Pro
PureBasic 5.73 |
SpiderBasic 2.30 |
Windows 10 Pro (x64) |
Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.
netmaestro
PureBasic Bullfrog
Posts: 8451 Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
Post
by netmaestro » Sun Dec 23, 2012 9:08 pm
I don't know, I think MaestroBasic has a nice ring to it somehow, perhaps with something like a 3D bullfrog logo...
BERESHEIT
Nituvious
Addict
Posts: 1029 Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2009 4:57 am
Location: United States
Post
by Nituvious » Sun Dec 23, 2012 11:04 pm
Ribbit
▓▓▓▓▓▒▒▒▒▒░░░░░
Franky
Enthusiast
Posts: 213 Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 2:58 pm
Post
by Franky » Sun Dec 30, 2012 1:47 am
Give Up everything but trying!
Lubos
Enthusiast
Posts: 167 Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2004 12:32 am
Contact:
Post
by Lubos » Mon Mar 04, 2013 7:35 pm
djes wrote: PureBasic already means Professionals Understimates Real Efficiency of the Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code
The acronym is cute and I like it. Only small error is in it. The verb (Underestimate) must be without ending "s", because subject (Proffesionals) is plural. Maybe a typo.
Windows 7 Professional / Service Pack 1 - 32bit, PureBasic 5.46 LTS (x86)
My mother tongue is Czech. I have a Czech version of Windows.
Who is not afraid of GOTO, the one need not afraid any things!
fsw
Addict
Posts: 1603 Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2003 9:18 pm
Location: North by Northwest
Post
by fsw » Mon Mar 04, 2013 9:28 pm
What about ProBeer
Tons of German speaking programmers would at least "try" out this language...
I suppose that DoctorLove wanted to make the point that PureBasic passed all other BASIC's in functionality and versatility.
At this point in time it's the last BASIC-like language I frequently use (all the other ones have C-stle syntax...)
I am to provide the public with beneficial shocks.
Alfred Hitshock
SFSxOI
Addict
Posts: 2970 Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....
Post
by SFSxOI » Tue Mar 05, 2013 5:47 pm
not at the Pro stage yet...
The advantage of a 64 bit operating system over a 32 bit operating system comes down to only being twice the headache.
Lord
Addict
Posts: 907 Joined: Tue May 26, 2009 2:11 pm
Post
by Lord » Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:46 am
SFSxOI wrote: not at the Pro stage yet...
I don't think so.
But at least it's always pro
visional .
Didelphodon
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 450 Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2004 11:56 am
Location: Vienna - Austria
Contact:
Post
by Didelphodon » Wed Mar 06, 2013 9:06 am
Awesome idea! And then let's continue changing Fred's name. What about Prod? Instructions would come next: ProEach, ProEver, ProIf, ...
Go, tell it on the mountains.