VMWare, Virtual PC & Co.

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
Max.
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:39 pm

VMWare, Virtual PC & Co.

Post by Max. »

Some time ago, I made very good experiences with VMWare, both under Linux as on Win NT, when working for a company's project.
As I do have a personal demand now, but VMWare is quite expansive, I wonder if there are any cheaper - but still good - alternatives.

Did any of you try out MS Virtual PC (they aquired it from Connectix) and can give me some hints on pros and cons? Like supported OS (Linux is not officially supported, but heard it might be possible) or if/which DirectX versions are supported.

Of course any other emulation software is welcome, too; as long as it makes it very easy to quickly install a guest OS on a Windows 2000 machine. Mainly this should be Win 9x/NT/2000, but Linux would be welcome as well...

Thanks in advance.
Athlon64 3800+ · 1 GB RAM · Radeon X800 XL · Win XP Prof/SP1+IE6.0/Firefox · PB 3.94/4.0
Intel Centrino 1.4 MHz · 1.5 GB RAM · Radeon 9000 Mobility · Win XP Prof/SP2+IE6.0/Firefox · PB 3.94/4.0
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: VMWare, Virtual PC & Co.

Post by PB »

> Did any of you try out MS Virtual PC (they aquired it from Connectix)
> and can give me some hints on pros and cons?

I use Virtual PC and swear by it. I find it to be easier to set up and run
than VMWare, and runs in 99% real-time on my PC with high priority set,
and I only have a 665 mhz CPU (Pentium III). See these two links:

viewtopic.php?t=3563 (Virtual PC)
viewtopic.php?t=8168 (High priority)

In the Virtual PC post I give my reasons why I find it better than VMWare.
I don't know how good the app is now that MS has acquired it, though. ;)
User avatar
Psychophanta
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5153
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
Location: Anare
Contact:

Post by Psychophanta »

I used VirtualPC (Microsoft bought this product to Connectix after version 5, go to www.microsoft.com/virtualpc), it is easy to use and understand and i had no problem using linux, MSDOS, and all Windows OSes under Windows 2000Pro.
Karbon
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2010
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 1:42 am
Location: Ashland, KY
Contact:

Post by Karbon »

Inspired by this talk I just installed my copy of VMWare that I've had forever.. This is seriously cool stuff..

Now if I can just find a floppy drive to put in here so I can install 98!
-Mitchell
Check out kBilling for all your billing software needs!
http://www.k-billing.com
Code Signing / Authenticode Certificates (Get rid of those Unknown Publisher warnings!)
http://codesigning.ksoftware.net
AngelSoul
User
User
Posts: 55
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Canada

Post by AngelSoul »

You don't need a floopy drive necessarely, i think if i remember correctly it can boot from an image. If you have a win98 bootable cd you could extract the boot sector and store it to a small image file.

You can get this cool utility here: http://www.nu2.nu/bbie/

VMWare is very impressive and blazing fast for an emulation.
AMD 1.8 - 512mb - ATI All-In-Wonder Radeon 9000 pro - W2k Pro
BASIC programmers never die, they just return without gosub.
Max.
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 225
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 8:39 pm

Post by Max. »

Thanks, guys, for your remarks.

Had preferred a VMWare is bad or VirtualPC is bad over both are good though. :wink:
Athlon64 3800+ · 1 GB RAM · Radeon X800 XL · Win XP Prof/SP1+IE6.0/Firefox · PB 3.94/4.0
Intel Centrino 1.4 MHz · 1.5 GB RAM · Radeon 9000 Mobility · Win XP Prof/SP2+IE6.0/Firefox · PB 3.94/4.0
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> Had preferred a VMWare is bad or VirtualPC is bad over both are good
> though. :wink:

Hehehe, well I did say I preferred Virtual PC to VMWare... so, VMWare is
bad! :)
Post Reply