PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
karmacomposer
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:51 pm

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by karmacomposer »

ultralazor wrote:I will say, ogre is the only real drawback, because of the model formats and the lack of modern tools for them. There is one level tool for ogre formats, and it's nightmarish bad.. might as well say nothing for rigging and animation, topology has to be worked for mesh converters..

defininty needs better format support, ARM w8 and linux support would be cool, maybe android and ios .app compiling via sdk in roadmap

EDIT: I don't think most people here realize how close to abandonware PB is.. The few developers all have jobs and lives which historically speaking, always leads to abandonment of demanding products and projects.. It's proprietary too, so if they don't work nothing get done..
How can I believe that PureBasic is nearly dying when I see the devs working constantly on this software with fairly recent updates. Also, I have seen (and downloaded) wrappers for the Irrlicht engine for PureBasic and that is a very good engine.

Mike
User avatar
Tenaja
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1959
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:15 pm

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by Tenaja »

ultralazor wrote:EDIT: I don't think most people here realize how close to abandonware PB is.. The few developers all have jobs and lives which historically speaking, always leads to abandonment of demanding products and projects.. It's proprietary too, so if they don't work nothing get done..

Let's see...45 posts per day for four days straight, and most of those posts are announcements of a beta bugfix.

1. You are ignorant about the status of the developers.
2. You are ignorant about the work they are doing, currently.

Sure, the formula often ends in abandonment, but Fred has promised to open-source the compiler before it gets abandoned. There is no reason to disbelieve him, since he has o/s'd one version already.
User avatar
ultralazor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:00 am

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by ultralazor »

Tenaja wrote:
ultralazor wrote:EDIT: I don't think most people here realize how close to abandonware PB is.. The few developers all have jobs and lives which historically speaking, always leads to abandonment of demanding products and projects.. It's proprietary too, so if they don't work nothing get done..

Let's see...45 posts per day for four days straight, and most of those posts are announcements of a beta bugfix.

1. You are ignorant about the status of the developers.
2. You are ignorant about the work they are doing, currently.

Sure, the formula often ends in abandonment, but Fred has promised to open-source the compiler before it gets abandoned. There is no reason to disbelieve him, since he has o/s'd one version already.
right.. 2 developers.. 1 working for the last ~2 years who also has a full time job. I'm not gonna argue on it though cause it's pretty obvious and I'll only get redundant poorly thought out pseudo-contradictions till the thread gets scrapped..
so many ideas so little time..
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18247
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by Fred »

ultralazor wrote:right.. 2 developers.. 1 working for the last ~2 years who also has a full time job. I'm not gonna argue on it though cause it's pretty obvious and I'll only get redundant poorly thought out pseudo-contradictions till the thread gets scrapped..
PureBasic is here for more than a decade, which is a long long time for a software and it will continue. I'm now working at full time on PureBasic and I think everyone out of here can see the results. So please post your trolls somewhere else.
User avatar
electrochrisso
Addict
Addict
Posts: 989
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 2:13 am
Location: Darling River

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by electrochrisso »

Fred wrote:
ultralazor wrote:right.. 2 developers.. 1 working for the last ~2 years who also has a full time job. I'm not gonna argue on it though cause it's pretty obvious and I'll only get redundant poorly thought out pseudo-contradictions till the thread gets scrapped..
PureBasic is here for more than a decade, which is a long long time for a software and it will continue. I'm now working at full time on PureBasic and I think everyone out of here can see the results. So please post your trolls somewhere else.
Too right Fred, these people are just being a bit too silly, annoying even.
PureBasic! Purely the best 8)
Polo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2422
Joined: Tue May 06, 2003 5:07 pm
Location: UK

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by Polo »

Especially considering what Fred just did on OSX - brilliant work!
srod
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 10589
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: Beyond the pale...

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by srod »

Polo wrote:Especially considering what Fred just did on OSX...
Well I hope he cleaned it up... :twisted:

Fred and Timo are not human. No way can 2 guys do so much work. They must be bots; FredBot and TimoBot.

That's my theory anyhow. :)
I may look like a mule, but I'm not a complete ass.
User avatar
ultralazor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:00 am

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by ultralazor »

I'm a troll? :(

I'm now a bigger fan of fantasia software, and all the stuff they and their affiliates release/sale in the future. 8)

EDIT:lulz
so many ideas so little time..
PMV
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 727
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 3:15 pm
Location: Germany

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by PMV »

Since you are working fulltime on PureBasic, you have too much free-time Fred! :lol:
You shouldn't read and answer annoying threads like this.
Just work on the next update. :mrgreen:


:oops:
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18247
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by Fred »

:lol:
karmacomposer
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2012 2:51 pm

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by karmacomposer »

Fred wrote:
ultralazor wrote:right.. 2 developers.. 1 working for the last ~2 years who also has a full time job. I'm not gonna argue on it though cause it's pretty obvious and I'll only get redundant poorly thought out pseudo-contradictions till the thread gets scrapped..
PureBasic is here for more than a decade, which is a long long time for a software and it will continue. I'm now working at full time on PureBasic and I think everyone out of here can see the results. So please post your trolls somewhere else.
Well said. Well done. I look forward to all of your hard work.

Mike
User avatar
ultralazor
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 186
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 9:00 am

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by ultralazor »

If you have alternative opinions based on nuances like facts(note how everything I said is paraphrased from the front page of the blog..), you're a "troll".. how convenient

It's no wonder there are over 20 bugs the two devs admittedly don't have the skills to fix.. This IS just a FASM generator and ~30% of the IDE functionality is even bugged..

EDIT: you can ban be now so I can stop correcting the half-talents on your forums and pointing out your stupidity..
so many ideas so little time..
srod
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 10589
Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 4:35 pm
Location: Beyond the pale...

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by srod »

30% !!!

I don't know which IDE you are using; but it is not the same one I am?
I may look like a mule, but I'm not a complete ass.
User avatar
ts-soft
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Berlin - Germany

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by ts-soft »

since 40 years, i am using this one: Image
No bug at all :mrgreen:
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.
Image
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4220
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: PureBasic or Q7Basic?

Post by skywalk »

ts-soft's point should be obvious.
You can choose the level of whiz-bang IDE you like.
From Notepad to PB-IDE to NotePad++.
I use all of these, but the PB-IDE is way more efficient for pure coding.
For massive or redundant editing, I have to head to NotePad++ or write PB code that re-writes my code. :wink:
Given the passage of time I'm sure more IDE enhancements will come or even plug-ins that would enable us to integrate more automation into the PB-IDE.
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Post Reply