infratec wrote:Hi,
But that was the reason that rings moved this topic to Coding Questions.
Because it is easily possible to realize this functions in native PB language.
In the Feature Request and Wishlists area should only appear stuff which is not possible todo easily with native PB commands.
For example:
Select a printer by its name instead of always have to open the PrintRequester().
That is, at the moment, only possible via a lot of API stuff.
Bernd
I understand what you say... and many others are following simplification or replacement of Subroutine, Function, macros ... I have tons that no longer serve because of being replaced by a day with new features. . So when you can do I can not see why you could not ask? Especially here, an opening line and EGTT or PUT must be 47 lines of code "native" PB ... And excuse me, but it is easier to have a bug in a line 47 syntax error in a statement ...
So yes you can do with the current PB native, but also with basic instructions that did not and 50 and I did everything. But there is a long time.
Most functions like Date (), ADDDATE (Date, Range, Value), Bin (), CopyArray (), Degree (), Hour (), ReverseString(), and so on,
anything related to MAP (), and Hascode, I had used and create bitmaps there are over 25 years ... And now it's "only" MapKey (), perfect, and so many other folows the same way... Why, because it existed before, and could do it before ... Most of what we use in the current language are only improvements, simplifications of what has been done,
and that's very good ...
And when we remember a single thing that has become more complicated then it is also useful to remember...
But where?
In his wishes ! And that's what I did, and that's it.
I can do everything from 20 to 50 with a few commands or functions, gadgets or ASM, but why complicate things when it can be simple ?
We could talk a long time, what is useful or not ... New or just improved ! You should know that the vast majority of our current language is actually made up of former Subroutine, Function, Macro that have been reduced to one word, an expression! Program today would be redeveloped would see its number of rows multiplied by 30, 40 or more and that is what the library are first created by users and in which "x" time will become the orders "native" language of PB or in which they are ...
In short, glad of this exchange,
sincerely,
Gerhard