No, I would maybe attempt to work on it if I thought I had the skill/capacity to understand what I was doing; but I do not. I still have a lot to learn unfortunately, and I'm meeting enough challenges with my first project, in the limited time I have for programming.
But also, I do not agree that just because I lack the technical and logical understanding of how to write such a program, that disqualifies me (or anyone else) from using it /asking for it to be updated. Since the point of most libraries is to make complicated tasks easier / bring easier functionality that did not exist before, the whole point is for other people to not have to bash their head against the wall until their brain leaks out of their eye sockets.
This strikes me as interesting though.
Are you saying LUA has official PB bindings, or are you just talking about an include file? Most of the stuff I looked for on scripting wrappers, is older work that I don't believe is kept up to date with changes in w/ever language it was written for. Although I admit LUA seems very terse and cryptic to me, if you can give me a link to something easy to do for myself, I would doubtless look into it.eesau wrote:Lua already has bindings for PB, I suggest you use those. They are easy to use and Lua is pretty versatile. DracScript, while interesting, is somewhat limited, it doesn't even have functions.