PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Developed or developing a new product in PureBasic? Tell the world about it.
Post Reply
infratec
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7666
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Germany

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by infratec »

blueznl wrote:Yep. And then hopefully a quick 4.70 to have those missing sound / music / audio commands...
No, you are totally wrong.

4.60 is already a MultiMedia update.

So 4.70 will be a Network update, which allows full access to all network stuff
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Top
Foz
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by Foz »

I wonder, if when we (eventually) get to 4.90, will be version after be 4.100 or 5.00? :D
Top
infratec
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7666
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2008 12:45 pm
Location: Germany

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by infratec »

Foz wrote:I wonder, if when we (eventually) get to 4.90, will be version after be 4.100 or 5.00? :D
None of this.
It will be 4.A0

:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Top
Foz
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1359
Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 12:42 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by Foz »

:lol:
Top
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:
Contact blueznl

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by blueznl »

infratec wrote:
blueznl wrote:Yep. And then hopefully a quick 4.70 to have those missing sound / music / audio commands...
No, you are totally wrong.

4.60 is already a MultiMedia update.

So 4.70 will be a Network update, which allows full access to all network stuff
:mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. But not being able to detect how long a sound sample is, is just... silly. IMHO YMMV etc. etc. 8)

We all have different priorities. But seriously, what are you missing on the network side which would be difficult to program?
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Top
USCode
Addict
Addict
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by USCode »

blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Top
User avatar
shadow
User
User
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2010 1:25 pm
Location: Germany

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by shadow »

USCode wrote:
blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
agree :wink:
ThinkPad T61 | PureBasic 4.51 | Windows 7 (32) | Kubuntu 11.10 (64) | Syllable (32)
Top
Little John
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4807
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by Little John »

USCode wrote:To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Absolutely -- as far as I am concerned.

Regards, Little John
Top
User avatar
oryaaaaa
Addict
Addict
Posts: 832
Joined: Mon Jan 12, 2004 11:40 pm
Location: Okazaki, JAPAN

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by oryaaaaa »

Thank you

Test Japanese Display ( Linux x86 )

Ubuntu 11.04 on Parallels6 for MacOSX ( Video recommmend 720p)
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... 15&t=46610
Top
User avatar
blueznl
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 6172
Joined: Sat May 17, 2003 11:31 am
Contact:
Contact blueznl

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by blueznl »

USCode wrote:
blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
To many of us, cross-platform support is a key attraction to PureBasic.
Yeah, you're right. It isn't. Forgot about that.

Weird though, I think / assume there's socket stuff on Linux as well (in fact, socket stuff originated on Unix, Berkely IIRC). Shouldn't be too hard for Fred & Friends to expand on sockets, I guess...

I dunno, I'm not the expert...
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
Top
USCode
Addict
Addict
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by USCode »

Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed" by Fred or Freak since early May so it will still likely be awhile before 4.60 Beta 4 or Final rolls out.
Isn't this typically the time of year when Europeans take long holidays? If anyone deserves a nice long relaxing holiday, it's Fred and Freak! 8)
Top
MachineCode
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1482
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by MachineCode »

USCode wrote:Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed"
Bugs get flagged as "Done", not "Fixed". So if you literally searched for "Fixed" then that's why you had no hits.
Microsoft Visual Basic only lasted 7 short years: 1991 to 1998.
PureBasic: Born in 1998 and still going strong to this very day!
Top
USCode
Addict
Addict
Posts: 924
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2004 11:04 pm
Location: Seattle

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by USCode »

MachineCode wrote:
USCode wrote:Just did a search and nothing's been flagged as "Fixed"
Bugs get flagged as "Done", not "Fixed". So if you literally searched for "Fixed" then that's why you had no hits.
They post "Fixed." the bug's thread if a fix was actually made.
Top
MachineCode
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1482
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by MachineCode »

I mean the subject of the bug report is marked as [Done]. They also put "Fixed" in the body of the reports. So, we're both right. :)
Microsoft Visual Basic only lasted 7 short years: 1991 to 1998.
PureBasic: Born in 1998 and still going strong to this very day!
Top
Ramihyn_
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 314
Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2006 9:40 am

Re: PureBasic 4.60 beta 3

Post by Ramihyn_ »

blueznl wrote:Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. But not being able to detect how long a sound sample is, is just... silly. IMHO YMMV etc. etc. 8)
That's why i use BASS. AFAIR you can find a PB wrapper on this forum which still works.
USCode wrote:
blueznl wrote:... Network stuff is easy, just use WinSock. ...
WinSock isn't cross-platform, is it?
WinSock is based on BSD sockets. If you use BSD socket functions and then add two/three special WinSock calls for your Windows executable, you have fully compatible cross-platform networking.
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Announcement”