Look: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PureBasic
How can we stop this from happening?





RadioFan wrote:unremarkable comercial programming language implementation. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Google webserarch on the topic brings up manufacturer's website and forums plus some self published blogs. Google news brings up no hits and Google books brings up a single book on the topic. Not clear how this might meet WP:GNG




A new section for the Wikipedia article, briefly listing PB's USPs, might be a good idea.MachineCode wrote:COBOL and PureBasic are still around because very few languages natively and easily handle financial computations in a sane manner.


