"Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
Mistrel
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:04 pm

"Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by Mistrel »

I'm surprised this hasn't been requested before. :|

At least, I couldn't find any previous requests.
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4211
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: "Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by skywalk »

The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Mistrel
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3415
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2007 8:04 pm

Re: "Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by Mistrel »

I suppose that restricting my search to title only was a bad idea. :x
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4211
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: "Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by skywalk »

This raises the question whether requests are visible when buried in a topic?
freak
PureBasic Team
PureBasic Team
Posts: 5940
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:21 pm
Location: Germany

Re: "Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by freak »

skywalk wrote:So, is it recommended that each singular request be created in a separate topic to be noticed?
skywalk wrote:This raises the question whether requests are visible when buried in a topic?
Stop worrying so much. This is not a competition.
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
User avatar
skywalk
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4211
Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:14 pm
Location: Boston, MA

Re: "Find Previous" for IDE text searching in reverse

Post by skywalk »

freak wrote:Stop worrying so much. This is not a competition.
No worries Freak.
But I do have my code open in so many windows beyond the IDE that I was a bit frustrated. :(

On the contrary, I prefer more users make the same requests I do. :wink:
The nice thing about standards is there are so many to choose from. ~ Andrew Tanenbaum
Post Reply