PureC++

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
User avatar
Kuron
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

PureC++

Post by Kuron »

PureC++ is an open source collection libraries designed to make the transition from PureBasic to C++ easier. The libraries allow a PureBasic programmer to use some PureBasic functions in C++. At the moment this is a Win32 only project.

http://purecpp.sourceforge.net


I am not connected to the above, but stumbled on it this evening and thought I would share.
User avatar
Blue Steel
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 132
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:49 pm
Contact:

Re: PureC++

Post by Blue Steel »

thanks for sharing ;)
Currently using PureBasic 4.51(x86)

Image http://www.codingmonkeys.com
Covers many languages including PureBasic
User avatar
Demivec
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4260
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 3:51 pm
Location: Utah, USA

Re: PureC++

Post by Demivec »

Kuron wrote:PureC++ is an open source collection libraries designed to make the transition from PureBasic to C++ easier. The libraries allow a PureBasic programmer to use some PureBasic functions in C++. At the moment this is a Win32 only project.
It seems that the name is actually a shortened form of 'PureConsole++', or maybe those just happen to be the only functions provided so far.

I still don't get where does the transition part comes in. Having limited experience with C++, couldn't a PureBasic DLL just be created and then called from C++? Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries? I would have thought that many solutions would already have been created to do the same things in C++ code.

Note: I'm not ragging, just some observations. :)
moogle
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: PureC++

Post by moogle »

Demivec wrote:
Kuron wrote:Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries? I would have thought that many solutions would already have been created to do the same things in C++ code.

Note: I'm not ragging, just some observations. :)
To give the same easy functionality that PB gives? Why create DLLs in PB and use them in C++ when C++ can do it itself :)

Nice find Kuron. Would be nice if it had more commands though :D
Image
User avatar
Kuron
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: PureC++

Post by Kuron »

Demivec wrote:I still don't get where does the transition part comes in.
I don't know, and I have not looked at the product and do not plan to. I simply stumbled on the site, pasted the URL and description from the site here since it may be of interest to other users.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: PureC++

Post by PB »

> couldn't a PureBasic DLL just be created and then called from C++?

Of course.

> Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries?

I hope that it's not just a wrapper for the PureBasic libraries.
Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
moogle
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 372
Joined: Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:27 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: PureC++

Post by moogle »

PB wrote:I hope that it's not just a wrapper for the PureBasic libraries.
Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
Well if you looked you can see the source code there, what looks to be standard C++ code and some winapi.
Image
User avatar
Kuron
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1626
Joined: Sat Oct 17, 2009 10:51 pm
Location: Pacific Northwest

Re: PureC++

Post by Kuron »

PB wrote:Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
It would not be illegal, but it would be against the TOS.
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. ♥️
Post Reply