PureC++ is an open source collection libraries designed to make the transition from PureBasic to C++ easier. The libraries allow a PureBasic programmer to use some PureBasic functions in C++. At the moment this is a Win32 only project.
http://purecpp.sourceforge.net
I am not connected to the above, but stumbled on it this evening and thought I would share.
PureC++
- Blue Steel
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 4:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: PureC++
thanks for sharing 

Currently using PureBasic 4.51(x86)
http://www.codingmonkeys.com
Covers many languages including PureBasic

Covers many languages including PureBasic
Re: PureC++
It seems that the name is actually a shortened form of 'PureConsole++', or maybe those just happen to be the only functions provided so far.Kuron wrote:PureC++ is an open source collection libraries designed to make the transition from PureBasic to C++ easier. The libraries allow a PureBasic programmer to use some PureBasic functions in C++. At the moment this is a Win32 only project.
I still don't get where does the transition part comes in. Having limited experience with C++, couldn't a PureBasic DLL just be created and then called from C++? Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries? I would have thought that many solutions would already have been created to do the same things in C++ code.
Note: I'm not ragging, just some observations.

Re: PureC++
To give the same easy functionality that PB gives? Why create DLLs in PB and use them in C++ when C++ can do it itselfDemivec wrote:Kuron wrote:Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries? I would have thought that many solutions would already have been created to do the same things in C++ code.
Note: I'm not ragging, just some observations.

Nice find Kuron. Would be nice if it had more commands though


Re: PureC++
I don't know, and I have not looked at the product and do not plan to. I simply stumbled on the site, pasted the URL and description from the site here since it may be of interest to other users.Demivec wrote:I still don't get where does the transition part comes in.
Re: PureC++
> couldn't a PureBasic DLL just be created and then called from C++?
Of course.
> Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries?
I hope that it's not just a wrapper for the PureBasic libraries.
Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
Of course.
> Why the need to create C++ versions of the PureBasic libraries?
I hope that it's not just a wrapper for the PureBasic libraries.
Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Re: PureC++
Well if you looked you can see the source code there, what looks to be standard C++ code and some winapi.PB wrote:I hope that it's not just a wrapper for the PureBasic libraries.
Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.

Re: PureC++
It would not be illegal, but it would be against the TOS.PB wrote:Fred would be VERY interested if it were, as it's illegal. Hmm.
Best wishes to the PB community. Thank you for the memories. 