Can someone tell me if I'm doing something wrong...?, is it normal to be seeing PackMemory results with PureBasic x86 being different from PackMemory results with PureBasic x64 .. on the same unaltered file?
ʽʽSuccess is almost totally dependent upon drive and persistence. The extra energy required to make another effort or try another approach is the secret of winning.ʾʾ --Dennis Waitley
I remember being told this before, ... I like jCalg1 better, does better compression than the other one.
ʽʽSuccess is almost totally dependent upon drive and persistence. The extra energy required to make another effort or try another approach is the secret of winning.ʾʾ --Dennis Waitley
For the current project I'm looking to use jCalg1, for a few different reasons. But your code will surely be useful enough in the future!
Regards,
Thunder93
ʽʽSuccess is almost totally dependent upon drive and persistence. The extra energy required to make another effort or try another approach is the secret of winning.ʾʾ --Dennis Waitley
I added 2 lines for MacOS X-Support. Works great on PB 4.40b5 and PB 4.31 Intel
I will use these routines for my projects... I think on Mac OS, the file "/usr/lib/libz.dylib" is installed on default. But I don't know if it is save to rely on the existance. Maybe it's better to put a copy into the app-bundle also?!