freak wrote:
And btw, repeating your "ub" argument all over the forum won't help you the tiniest bit :roll:
It was not my intention to cause discomfort (well, perhaps a little, I admit

) but it's just bothering me as I like PureBasic that much... That it ended up in multiple threads was not intentional, I just referenced to the other post(s) as I thought that would explain it better.
Let me see...
- one thread to discuss the .a / .u issue
- one thread to indicate missing counterparts for .a / .u like there is for .b
- one reply in a thread where I misunderstood the request
- one thread about macros that relates to .a / .u
I think you're a bit harsh about it, to be honest... I know it's not my call, and I don't want to attack the pbdev team, I just feel it's... wrong.
And I fear I'm passionate enough to mention that. Oh well... :roll: It's a bit like the expression evaluation thingy, I understand it doesn't have your priority, yet it just drives me crazy and it's hard for me to stay silent when that happens
Now I have to wait until the 128 bits version before anyone starts listening to me... weheheheheheheeeee

At least then I can gloat: 'told you so'
