PureBasic 4.20 needed

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
Post Reply
DMC
New User
New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Germany

PureBasic 4.20 needed

Post by DMC »

Hi,

I have a serious problem. I am registered user since a few years and I need PB 4.20 registered setup-package, because some of the userlibs refuse to work with PB 4.30. But from the "registered user" area I can only download PB 4.30.

Any chance to get the PB 4.20 setup-package?

Thanks.

DMC
Top
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: PureBasic 4.20 needed

Post by PB »

You'd need to contact Fred with your details. It's not legal for us to give
it away, especially to a new user here with this as his only post. :roll:
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Top
DMC
New User
New User
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 06, 2009 9:43 am
Location: Germany

Post by DMC »

Ah, ok. I can understand that.

It would be very handy if you were able download the last 2 or 3 releases from the registered users are.

Anyway. I will contact fred via e-mail. Hope he can sort things out for me.

Thank you.
Top
User avatar
Kiffi
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1526
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: Amphibios 9

Post by Kiffi »

DMC wrote:It would be very handy if you were able download the last 2 or 3 releases from the registered users are.
+1

Greetings ... Kiffi
Hygge
Top
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> It would be very handy if you were able download the last 2 or 3 releases

Well, it's not really Fred's job to store the versions for you. Just keep 'em
after you download 'em. For example, here's my own personal collection:

Image
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Top
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

PB wrote: Well, it's not really Fred's job to store the versions for you.
But its your job to tell what Fred's job is?

This feature could have come in handy a few times last year, when i was switching workstation often. Usually i didn't use any userlibraries, but once in a while it was just needed due to pressure of time. And using different versions on the machines etc. It would have saved some time.
Top
Violet
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 106
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 6:30 pm

Post by Violet »

Uuuh, "PureBasic240.zip" :o I'm just curious about how PureBasic looked like those days :)
best regards,

Violet
Top
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18557
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:
Contact Fred

Post by Fred »

Violet wrote:Uuuh, "PureBasic240.zip" :o I'm just curious about how PureBasic looked like those days :)
Better not :P
Top
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> Uuuh, "PureBasic240.zip" :o I'm just curious about how PureBasic looked
> like those days :)

See this thread: http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=20711

The editor had only 5 options :!:

And the Compiler Options had only 3 settings :!:
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Top
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

Minimalistic :D

Was there a debugger?
Top
SFSxOI
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2970
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 5:24 pm
Location: Where ya would never look.....

Post by SFSxOI »

thefool wrote:Minimalistic :D

Was there a debugger?
Until he quit and decided to become a porn star. :)
Top
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> Was there a debugger?

Yep, there's a menu item called Debugger which is ticked, and a Debugger
folder. I didn't try to compile anything just now to test though, as it uses
commands that no longer exist (InitGadget etc) and all my sources don't
have them.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Top
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

PB wrote:> Was there a debugger?

Yep, there's a menu item called Debugger which is ticked, and a Debugger
folder. I didn't try to compile anything just now to test though, as it uses
commands that no longer exist (InitGadget etc) and all my sources don't
have them.
Oh yeah initgadget, i remember that :)
Until he quit and decided to become a porn star.
Oh, thats what Fr34k was doing! I suppose its just a 2nd job now, though.
Top
freak
PureBasic Team
PureBasic Team
Posts: 5962
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:21 pm
Location: Germany

Post by freak »

2.02 had 2 compiler options (NT4 and InlineASM) and no preferences for the editor at all. Also no debugger. It had a stunning 165 functions and everything was case sensitive :D

This is also intresting:
Image
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
Top
akj
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 668
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2003 10:08 pm
Location: Nottingham

Post by akj »

@freak:

I think your graph is wildly inaccurate as it suggests there are over 1100 PB functions in version 4.3. But the PureBasic home page definitely mentions only 800+ 'internal commands'.

I must trust the home page as this is PureBasic's 'mission statement' to the world at large so obviously will be 100% factually accurate otherwise potential users will be misled about the true power of PureBasic and so put off from using it. And we certainly wouldn't want that to happen, would we?

Therefore, please amend your graph so it reflects the truth as stated on the home page.
Anthony Jordan
Top
Post Reply

Return to “General Discussion”