First Purebasic
First Purebasic
Hi folks. I was just wondering, does anyone have the first PureBasic version? 1.0 - 2.0 or so? I'd like to check it out
.
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. (Goethe)
-
Killswitch
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 731
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:12 pm
Re: First Purebasic
> does anyone have the first PureBasic version?
I have v2.40, which is fairly early.
> I'd like to check it out
I can't give you a copy, but here's some screenshots which show just how far
the language has come. Note that back then there was no Visual Designer for
it either. These screenshots were taken under Windows XP, which is why they
don't look so good... but I guess that shows how well the latest version of
PureBasic has adapted!




Note about the Manual screenshot above: every topic in the Manual is seen
in the screenshot -- the scrollbar makes it appear that there's more to view,
but it's only white space below the Inlined x86 ASM topic.
I have v2.40, which is fairly early.
> I'd like to check it out
I can't give you a copy, but here's some screenshots which show just how far
the language has come. Note that back then there was no Visual Designer for
it either. These screenshots were taken under Windows XP, which is why they
don't look so good... but I guess that shows how well the latest version of
PureBasic has adapted!




Note about the Manual screenshot above: every topic in the Manual is seen
in the screenshot -- the scrollbar makes it appear that there's more to view,
but it's only white space below the Inlined x86 ASM topic.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Why can't you give me a copy? I am a registred user.
Thanks for the screenshots
. It looks awesome even for such an early version
. I really like Killswitch's idea about a repository. We could have the whole collection...
[Edit]
Oh, I know... It's because of the license, right?
Thanks for the screenshots
[Edit]
Oh, I know... It's because of the license, right?
None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. (Goethe)
IIRC:
Purebasic started life as a command set expansion for BlitzBasic on the Amiga called NCS (New Command Set). After that Mark Sibly dropped support for Blitz on the Amiga much to the dissapointment of lots of people so Fred decided to make NCS into a full blown language for the Amiga. Fred only decided to support windows after a bet from a friend!
After v1.60 MS windows support was added.
I don't think there was a public released v1 of Purebasic, v1 to v1.5 was alpha, then up to v2 was closed beta. I think PB has one of the earliest publically available versions.
Purebasic started life as a command set expansion for BlitzBasic on the Amiga called NCS (New Command Set). After that Mark Sibly dropped support for Blitz on the Amiga much to the dissapointment of lots of people so Fred decided to make NCS into a full blown language for the Amiga. Fred only decided to support windows after a bet from a friend!
I don't think there was a public released v1 of Purebasic, v1 to v1.5 was alpha, then up to v2 was closed beta. I think PB has one of the earliest publically available versions.
Yes, v2.0 was the first public version.Kale wrote:I don't think there was a public released v1 of Purebasic, v1 to v1.5 was alpha, then up to v2 was closed beta. I think PB has one of the earliest publically available versions.
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
> Mark Sibly dropped support for Blitz on the Amiga much to the dissapointment
> of lots of people
Yes, I was one of them.
> Fred only decided to support windows after a bet from a friend!
Why the wink? Was that "friend" you, by any chance?
> I don't think there was a public released v1 of Purebasic, v1 to v1.5 was
> alpha, then up to v2 was closed beta. I think PB has one of the earliest
> publically available versions.
From the v2.40 manual:
> of lots of people
Yes, I was one of them.
> Fred only decided to support windows after a bet from a friend!
Why the wink? Was that "friend" you, by any chance?
> I don't think there was a public released v1 of Purebasic, v1 to v1.5 was
> alpha, then up to v2 was closed beta. I think PB has one of the earliest
> publically available versions.
From the v2.40 manual:
22 October 2000 : Version 2.00 PR 1
- First public release of PureBasic x86. For testing purpose only
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Nah, not me, it was one of his university friends who asked him why he was supporting a dead platform (Amiga) and Fred said it was no hard task to port the source to x86 or any other cpu, So his m8 said go on then show me!PB wrote:> Fred only decided to support windows after a bet from a friend!
Why the wink? Was that "friend" you, by any chance?![]()
-
Num3
- PureBasic Expert

- Posts: 2812
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
- Location: Portugal, Lisbon
- Contact:
Hum...
My first windows version was 3.20
(This reminds me, gotta donate to Fred
you deserve it man ! )
But in fact i used it way before it was even a compiler!
http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/pub/aminet/c ... FM3.readme
1999 !!! WoooooW
My first windows version was 3.20
But in fact i used it way before it was even a compiler!
http://wuarchive.wustl.edu/pub/aminet/c ... FM3.readme
1999 !!! WoooooW
Last edited by Num3 on Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:01 pm, edited 2 times in total.
started with the first public PB amiga version and the NewCommandSet for BB2 Amiga! Exchanged some mails with fred this time, like C2P stuff! Then i taked a clother look to PB 2.10 (afaik), DarkBasic and some other coding languages for PC! Started official with PB 2.20 !?
va!n aka Thorsten
Intel i7-980X Extreme Edition, 12 GB DDR3, Radeon 5870 2GB, Windows7 x64,
Intel i7-980X Extreme Edition, 12 GB DDR3, Radeon 5870 2GB, Windows7 x64,
> still miss the topic on the command helpsite... like Manual v2.40
What do you mean? Do you want a copy of the Manual? That'd be up to Fred.
If he says it's okay, I'll zip it up and put a link to it here.
BTW, here's an archive of how PureBasic.com looked on Feb 01, 2001:
http://web.archive.org/web/200102010604 ... basic.com/

What do you mean? Do you want a copy of the Manual? That'd be up to Fred.
If he says it's okay, I'll zip it up and put a link to it here.
BTW, here's an archive of how PureBasic.com looked on Feb 01, 2001:
http://web.archive.org/web/200102010604 ... basic.com/
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.

