I am unable to install any 430 beta.
-
- New User
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: UK
I am unable to install any 430 beta.
What is going wrong?
I am unable to install any 430 beta.
The program install ok but when I try co compile my project I get error string extention library is missing. Having cheked PB library folder it is missing
This is happening in Vista and XP
I am unable to install any 430 beta.
The program install ok but when I try co compile my project I get error string extention library is missing. Having cheked PB library folder it is missing
This is happening in Vista and XP
remove the incompatible userlibs, this is not a pb bug
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

-
- PureBasic Expert
- Posts: 4229
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
- Location: Strasbourg / France
- Contact:
Re: I am unable to install any 430 beta.
You probably have some user libraries not compatible with PB4.30surefire00 wrote:... when I try co compile my project I get error string extention library is missing...
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
-
- New User
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:26 pm
- Location: UK
I am unable to install any 430 beta.
Thank you for youe qiuck reply.
The only library I have installed is Purevision, without which my project will not compile. So I will stick to 420 for now
Thanks again.
The only library I have installed is Purevision, without which my project will not compile. So I will stick to 420 for now
Thanks again.
- Kaeru Gaman
- Addict
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
- Location: Germany
What I mean is, most people will just install the new PureBasic over the old
one, without doing anything to the userlib folder. Perhaps the Updater could
rename the userlib folder to the old version number, to show that it's specific
to an older PureBasic version? Would help newbies discover their problem.
one, without doing anything to the userlib folder. Perhaps the Updater could
rename the userlib folder to the old version number, to show that it's specific
to an older PureBasic version? Would help newbies discover their problem.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
- Kaeru Gaman
- Addict
- Posts: 4826
- Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
- Location: Germany
- Rook Zimbabwe
- Addict
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:16 pm
- Location: Cypress TX
- Contact: