I am unable to install any 430 beta.

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
surefire00
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: UK

I am unable to install any 430 beta.

Post by surefire00 »

What is going wrong?
I am unable to install any 430 beta.
The program install ok but when I try co compile my project I get error string extention library is missing. Having cheked PB library folder it is missing
This is happening in Vista and XP
User avatar
ts-soft
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Berlin - Germany

Post by ts-soft »

remove the incompatible userlibs, this is not a pb bug
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.
Image
gnozal
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 4229
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 8:27 am
Location: Strasbourg / France
Contact:

Re: I am unable to install any 430 beta.

Post by gnozal »

surefire00 wrote:... when I try co compile my project I get error string extention library is missing...
You probably have some user libraries not compatible with PB4.30
For free libraries and tools, visit my web site (also home of jaPBe V3 and PureFORM).
surefire00
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Thu May 11, 2006 2:26 pm
Location: UK

I am unable to install any 430 beta.

Post by surefire00 »

Thank you for youe qiuck reply.
The only library I have installed is Purevision, without which my project will not compile. So I will stick to 420 for now
Thanks again.
User avatar
Kaeru Gaman
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4826
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Kaeru Gaman »

pse note: when installing another version of PB, it's necessary to install it into a virgin directory!
oh... and have a nice day.
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18342
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

no, it's not necessary.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

It is necessary if you wish to avoid incompatible user lib problems.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18342
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

well, if your program use them, you will have to copy them as well, so the result is the same.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

What I mean is, most people will just install the new PureBasic over the old
one, without doing anything to the userlib folder. Perhaps the Updater could
rename the userlib folder to the old version number, to show that it's specific
to an older PureBasic version? Would help newbies discover their problem.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
juror
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 233
Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 4:47 pm
Location: Courthouse

Post by juror »

PB wrote:What I mean is, most people will just install the new PureBasic over the old
one, without doing anything to the userlib folder.
For a beta? I always install a beta into a fresh directory and keep my old one.
User avatar
Kaeru Gaman
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4826
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Kaeru Gaman »

I would like to have the version number in the .exe name and in the
folder name to ease running different versions on the same machine.
I can't convince my windumb to open 4.2 when double clicking a .pb file,
it insists in opening the 4.1
oh... and have a nice day.
User avatar
Rings
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1435
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 1:11 am

Post by Rings »

topic moved
SPAMINATOR NR.1
User avatar
Rook Zimbabwe
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4322
Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:16 pm
Location: Cypress TX
Contact:

Post by Rook Zimbabwe »

Perhaps the Updater could
rename the userlib folder to the old version number, to show that it's specific
to an older PureBasic version? Would help newbies discover their problem.
That sounds like a good idea to me. :D
Binarily speaking... it takes 10 to Tango!!!

Image
http://www.bluemesapc.com/
Post Reply