Using EXECryptor with PureBasic

MrMat · Post by **MrMat** » Thu Oct 25, 2007 11:21 pm

Micko wrote:Hi
Someone can tell me the link to download PBCoffee for EXECryptor please ?

PBCoffee was for PureBasic 3.9x and doesn't work (and isn't needed) to use Execryptor with PureBasic 4.xx. There should be explanation somewhere above on using Execryptor with PB.

I stopped using Execryptor some time ago and no longer have it installed so hopefully there is enough info around or someone else can help.

Rook Zimbabwe · Post by **Rook Zimbabwe** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 5:02 am

Is there any news on this topic?

dell_jockey · Post by **dell_jockey** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 7:18 pm

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:Is there any news on this topic?

as a customer of this company, I haven't heard from them for a long time. Shortly after PB 4.x I reported to them that their product could no longer be used with the current version of PB. I got a form letter reply, since then 'no joy' on that channel.

MrMat · Post by **MrMat** » Wed Apr 16, 2008 8:03 pm

It should still work with some ammendments even after ProcedureDLL was changed. I think it was something like putting:

Code: Select all

!public _Procedure0 As '_EXECryptor_AntiDebug'

at the start of each procedure in the EXECryptor include (amend as necessary for each procedure e.g. !public _ProcedureN As '_ProcedureName' where N can be found from the generated asm).

Unfortunately my posts showing how to get it to work disappeared from their boards and i no longer have it installed so i can't check.

Mike Trader · Post by **Mike Trader** » Fri Apr 18, 2008 2:01 am

I was very dissapointed with EXEcryptor. It exhibited some bugs with another compiler and after many emails and postings on their forum (very user unfriendly website) I gave up.

The product seems to be defunct.

I can however strongly reccomend a substitute product i found that I now use called Code Virtualizer.
http://www.oreans.com/

(I am not associated with either of these companies)

localmotion34 · Post by **localmotion34** » Sat Jun 28, 2008 3:34 am

Whether or not this program will work with PB is now irrelevant.

PB user thinking of using this protection should check out Team {Res} or Team SND forums, and see the sheer level at which EXECryptor is abused by reversers.

Patching Mov AL, 3 after registration check calls to the VM fully and completely registers the program.

There is now even an unpacker for this protector, which works almost flawlessly.

And BTW, dont even think of using the new Armadillo 6.0 either. Armageddon, the new ARTeam unpacker fully unpacks the beta.

We're all screwed now. hahaha.

dell_jockey · Post by **dell_jockey** » Sun Jun 29, 2008 8:44 am

localmotion34 wrote:Whether or not this program will work with PB is now irrelevant.

PB user thinking of using this protection should check out Team {Res} or Team SND forums, and see the sheer level at which EXECryptor is abused by reversers.

Patching Mov AL, 3 after registration check calls to the VM fully and completely registers the program.

There is now even an unpacker for this protector, which works almost flawlessly.

And BTW, dont even think of using the new Armadillo 6.0 either. Armageddon, the new ARTeam unpacker fully unpacks the beta.

We're all screwed now. hahaha.

Thanks Localmotion, for this information. So what do we do now to limit the usage of or software to a defined user group?