To say that OOP is 'dying badly' is immensely absurd to say the least. OOP is here to stay and is supported in nearly all modern languages. To shun it without exploring it, is like an ostrich burying its head in the sand. As a programmer you will always be lesser than someone with OOP knowledge professionally and intellectually. But hey, that's my opinion.
As for C++ being the be all and end all of OOP, i think Alan Kay said it best:
"I invented the term Object-Oriented, and I can tell you I did not have C++ in mind."
- Alan Kay
Instead, have a look at C# and the .NET framework for pure elegance and fall in love with programming all over again.
OOP is dying badly (offtopic from trendcontrol)
-
Fluid Byte
- Addict
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:41 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
These pointless threads always pop up one in a while but unfortuneatly never lead anywhere besides flaming or a lot of blah blah.
Regardless if OOP is useful or not (wich only works individually anyway), PB never was and never will be OOP.
Regardless if OOP is useful or not (wich only works individually anyway), PB never was and never will be OOP.
Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit / Whose Hoff is it anyway?
-
Rook Zimbabwe
- Addict
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:16 pm
- Location: Cypress TX
- Contact:
COPY CON: is the only editor for real men!
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
-
Fluid Byte
- Addict
- Posts: 2336
- Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:41 am
- Location: Berlin, Germany
Notepad
+ MS Paint
----------------------
= 0wNz j00 4$$!
+ MS Paint
----------------------
= 0wNz j00 4$$!
Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit / Whose Hoff is it anyway?
Emacs, what else?
btw: Though I think the whole OOP + functional features + make coffe + one language solves all problems (also making coffee) and so on is really getting boring (and will never find an end due to the fact that we all are different):
I agree with Kale.
btw: Though I think the whole OOP + functional features + make coffe + one language solves all problems (also making coffee) and so on is really getting boring (and will never find an end due to the fact that we all are different):
I agree with Kale.
Yes. I'm experiencing the same ATM.Instead, have a look at C# and the .NET framework for pure elegance and fall in love with programming all over again.
cheers,
bembulak
bembulak
You mean over don't you?Chaos wrote:OOP is only a layer under procedural way .
Paul Dwyer
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
“In nature, it’s not the strongest nor the most intelligent who survives. It’s the most adaptable to change” - Charles Darwin
“If you can't explain it to a six-year old you really don't understand it yourself.” - Albert Einstein
-
Rook Zimbabwe
- Addict
- Posts: 4322
- Joined: Tue Jan 02, 2007 8:16 pm
- Location: Cypress TX
- Contact:
I must say, that I can't see how waiting (on the IDE, on the compiler, on your own program) leads to loving programming.Instead, have a look at C# and the .NET framework for pure elegance and fall in love with programming all over again.
To learn to like programming, you must actually program. Not sit around waiting on an IDE that takes 5 minutes to load, or a Hello World program that takes 5 seconds to compile and 3 seconds to launch. (Note: I didn't test those numbers, but the C# express IDE used over 30 seconds to create an empty project, and I did time that.)
Of course, some of us has super computers, but giving the programmer the fastest machine usually results in things like .NET.
Edit: This doesn't mean that C# is a bad language, once you can use it.