IDE: Autocomplete for structure-entries

Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
Dare
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1965
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Outback

Post by Dare »

Maybe a sticky at the top of this forum:
Subject Title wrote: Consider all requests answered with "Maybe (not)"
Post body wrote: Your input is appreciated.

We can either answer every question or get on with improving PureBasic across 3 operating systems (which includes implementing some requested features).

We have elected to do the latter.

Please consider that all posted requests are answered as follows:
  • This may or may not be a good idea.
    We may or may not consider it in a future release.
    If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
    Otherwise take it that:
    • This may or may not be a good idea.
      We may or may not consider it in a future release.
      If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
      Otherwise take it that:
      • This may or may not be a good idea.
        We may or may not consider it in a future release.
        If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
        Otherwise take it that:
    (Recurring - Recursive until stack overflows)
Thank you!
:)
Dare2 cut down to size
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Trond »

Dare wrote:Maybe a sticky at the top of this forum:
Subject Title wrote: Consider all requests answered with "Maybe (not)"
Post body wrote: Your input is appreciated.

We can either answer every question or get on with improving PureBasic across 3 operating systems (which includes implementing some requested features).

We have elected to do the latter.

Please consider that all posted requests are answered as follows:
  • This may or may not be a good idea.
    We may or may not consider it in a future release.
    If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
    Otherwise take it that:
    • This may or may not be a good idea.
      We may or may not consider it in a future release.
      If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
      Otherwise take it that:
      • This may or may not be a good idea.
        We may or may not consider it in a future release.
        If a post grabs our attention for whatever reason, we may respond.
        Otherwise take it that:
    (Recurring - Recursive until stack overflows)
Thank you!
:)
An excellent idea. Can we get a comment from the team? :wink:
Dare
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1965
Joined: Mon May 29, 2006 1:01 am
Location: Outback

Post by Dare »

Trond wrote:Can we get a comment from the team? :wink:
:lol:
Dare2 cut down to size
AND51
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1040
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 8:56 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by AND51 »

Very funny :twisted:
PB 4.30

Code: Select all

onErrorGoto(?Fred)
#NULL
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: right here

Post by #NULL »

+5 ( :twisted: )
User avatar
tinman
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1102
Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2003 4:56 pm
Location: Level 5 of Robot Hell
Contact:

Post by tinman »

I know this is an old topic and we have auto complete now, but what about having auto complete for structured fields pop up immediately after typing the "\" character and show only the fields in the structure, rather than have to wait for however many characters have been set in the preferences. It would be far more useful for structures this way.
If you paint your butt blue and glue the hole shut you just themed your ass but lost the functionality.
(WinXPhSP3 PB5.20b14)
#NULL
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1497
Joined: Thu Aug 30, 2007 11:54 pm
Location: right here

Post by #NULL »

i would like that indeed
Post Reply