PropertyViewer [canceled]

byo · Post by **byo** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:06 pm

Fluid Byte wrote:They can't because my code is hard to read.

I thought it was very clear to read. You isolated parts of code with well named procedures so what the example is doing is pretty self-explanatory. A good read and a good study.

So no worries. I will integrate item folding (and possible bugfixes) as soon as possible. So the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.

Yikes!

.

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:33 pm

I thought it was very clear to read.

Shhhhhh!!

srod · Post by **srod** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 2:42 pm

...so the user don't have be concerned about anything but hitting F5.

Oh I see, leave all the hard work to us then!

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface? Come on, pull your finger out lad!

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:10 pm

@nicolaus:
Source has been updated. Please try again.

Rook Zimbabwe · Post by **Rook Zimbabwe** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 5:45 pm

@ FByte: That is first class coding there Mr.!

How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?

I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!

dontmailme · Post by **dontmailme** » Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:29 pm

Rook Zimbabwe wrote:
How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?
I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!

Yeah..... I used those once too..... but the program just sat there doing nothing....... just like me

Dare · Post by **Dare** » Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:03 am

dontmailme wrote:
Rook Zimbabwe wrote:
How much trouble would it be to add a thought projection interface?
I did that with mine... I just used the old #SillyRequestTPI routines!
Yeah..... I used those once too..... but the program just sat there doing nothing....... just like me

gnozal · Post by **gnozal** » Thu Oct 18, 2007 7:36 am

I tried the latest code and it crashes (IMA) with Win98SE in PROV_WindowProc() [at ... = CreateSolidBrush_(*prcv\Color)].

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Thu Oct 18, 2007 8:21 am

Unicode is deactivated? Also you may try again with threadsafe on. It seemed to work for some people.

Poshu · Post by **Poshu** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 9:02 am

Impressive & useful.
Thx

Micko · Post by **Micko** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 6:09 pm

thanks Fluid Byte

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Wed Nov 21, 2007 8:31 pm

Thank you both.

Unicode + keyboard navigation will be integrated soon.

superadnim · Post by **superadnim** » Fri Dec 07, 2007 2:02 pm

I tried adding item folding, but it was clear from the first moment I read the very structures you did not follow a hierarchical model, which is the model this sort of control is based on!!

doing simple stuff such as knowing how many childs a parent has becomes an issue without a proper hierarchical model.

I love the idea of simulating this sort of control, I love how you began working on it, but I just don't like the approach you took to do it.

If you ever plan on rewriting at least the structures, do use a parent-child model, because that will make further development of the control very very simple.

Right now it looks like it grew to that point where its better to keep on adding than changing half of it, for the sake of the universe continuum.

nicolaus · Post by **nicolaus** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:03 pm

@Fluid Byte do you have any news ?

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:50 pm

Nope sorry. I will be quite busy next week again. I havn't touched this project in my xmas vacation bacause I was to busy getting drunk.