#CRLF$ without the $

Mistrel · Post by **Mistrel** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:36 am

We have #CR and #LF. Can we please have a native #CRLF?

Post by **Kiffi** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:52 am

Mistrel wrote:We have #CR and #LF. Can we please have a native #CRLF?

#CR => 13
#LF => 10
#CRLF => ???

1310? 23?

Greetings ... Kiffi

DarkDragon · Post by **DarkDragon** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:06 am

Kiffi wrote:
Mistrel wrote:We have #CR and #LF. Can we please have a native #CRLF?
#CR => 13
#LF => 10
#CRLF => ???

1310? 23?

Greetings ... Kiffi

#CRLF = #LF << 8 | #CR, isn't it?

Code: Select all

#CRLF = #LF << 8 | #CR
a.s = #CRLF$
Debug PeekW(@a)
Debug #CRLF
; Try if Chr() works with such constructs which could be misunderstood as unicode characters.
If Chr(#CRLF) = Chr(#CR) + Chr(#LF)
  Debug "Works."
Else
  Debug "Works definately not."
EndIf

But it's true: I can't see any sense in it, because we can't do Chr(#CRLF)

Post by **Kiffi** » Sun Jan 06, 2008 10:12 am

@DD: What i try to explain is, that IMHO it makes no sense to have a #CRLF

Greetings ... Kiffi

pdwyer · Post by **pdwyer** » Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:20 am

I don't really understand this... ?

it would be 16bit then? Hard to use in a byte array. Not usable like that for unicode either.

I'm not against it, I'm just trying to understand it.

PureBasic Forums - English

#CRLF$ without the $

#CRLF$ without the $

Re: #CRLF$ without the $

Re: #CRLF$ without the $

Re: #CRLF$ without the $