Any experience with MS Messenger clone in Linux?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
User avatar
Psychophanta
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5153
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
Location: Anare
Contact:

Any experience with MS Messenger clone in Linux?

Post by Psychophanta »

Are there some guy who had tried some MS Messenger compatible program under Linux?
If yes AND it works, what is the program name?
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com

while (world==business) world+=mafia;
KarLKoX
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:13 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by KarLKoX »

pidgin (gtk/gome), kopete (qt/kde) and amsn are a few examples of fully compatible (and tested by me) msn messenger (multi protocole) program under Linux.
Last edited by KarLKoX on Sat Apr 21, 2007 9:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Qui baise trop bouffe un poil." P. Desproges

http://karlkox.blogspot.com/
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18556
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

There is GAIM as well.
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

Fred wrote:There is GAIM as well.
GAIM rocks! :D
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
MrMat
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:27 am
Location: England

Post by MrMat »

Pidgin is Gaim (it was renamed for legal reasons). It has slower file transfers than MSN and doesn't support a great deal of features but i like it. Mercury Messenger is supposed to support more MSN features but i haven't tried it.
Mat
User avatar
Psychophanta
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5153
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
Location: Anare
Contact:

Post by Psychophanta »

Aha!, thanks, mhhh, i feel myself out-of-time with linux.
In fact, the Messenger compatibility was almost the only thing which retains me working inside the MSWindows world.
I must begin to seriously thinking to change to Linux (till now i was not serious with that). 8)
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com

while (world==business) world+=mafia;
WishMaster
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 277
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 7:13 pm
Location: Franconia
Contact:

Post by WishMaster »

Kopete is the best :D
Jabber, IRC, ICQ, MSN, AIM, ... what else do you need? GroupWise, Gadu-Gadu or Yahoo? It's all here.
Image Image
User avatar
bembulak
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 576
Joined: Mon Mar 06, 2006 3:53 pm
Location: Austria

Post by bembulak »

It's simple:
if you're stuck with QT/KDE then use Kopete,
elseif you're stuck with GTK/Gnome or GTK/XFCE then use GAIM.

If you have any other DE, WM, use what ever you want.
cheers,

bembulak
KarLKoX
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:13 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by KarLKoX »

KarLKoX wrote:pidgin (gtk/gome), kopete (qt/kde) and amsn are a few examples of fully compatible (and tested by me) msn messenger (multi protocole) program under Linux.
"Qui baise trop bouffe un poil." P. Desproges

http://karlkox.blogspot.com/
codemaniac
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 289
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:22 am
Location: Finland

Post by codemaniac »

KMess is a really cool and small MSN Messenger for KDE. It has a GUI similar to Windows Messenger and has a handful of features too!
Cute?
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

there are even Commandline clients for those of us who like the comfort of commanding their system instead of holding the mouse^^ for example centericq
User avatar
Psychophanta
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5153
Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
Location: Anare
Contact:

Post by Psychophanta »

command line = comfort :?: :shock: :lol:

Here is my definition; the maximum comfort is to transfer data between a machine (aka device, which can be a human or not human) and another machine (which can be another human or not human) in the fastest AND lazyest way :wink:
http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com

while (world==business) world+=mafia;
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

hmm well depends on what you do, i think for most non Graphical tasks (I won't try Photo editing on the CLI) CLI can be faster and as easy as GUI if you know what you do. And for many tasks I use the CLI because it's less work, for example when I want to downlaod a huge file and I want to downlaod it comfortable I just fie up my terminal (1. click) and type in "wget " then I press strg+v and enter, thats much faster than I could do with a normal Download amager especially when the Terminal is already open. Another example would be to remove every textfile in a given folder (for example notes taht don't belong in your phtots directory) on the CLI I simply switch to the folder and type "rm *.txt" and thats it. Now try to do the same task in a graphical file manager. Let me give another example, I want to know wether progarm xyz is running, it's easy with a task manager but looking through the process list (when the program has no window for example) may take a few seconds on the cli I simply type "ps ax | grep xyz" and It shows me wether the program is running, I'm not realy a CLI Wizard but if I where there were even more tasks which I could do in no time on the cli.

If you look for example at a list like this: http://www.pixelbeat.org/cmdline.html
you might imagine the possibilitys.

Btw how long does it take you in Purebasic to write a program that sends random data to some host port to do stress testing.
Post Reply