Yay! interesting topic. Lets see my 1st cent is this:
PowerBasic gives a 30 money back guarantee... So, for those who didnt
got the phisical delivery... too bad.
Dont let yourselves get deceived, Anybody that doesnt know how it works,
will consider it a waste. But if the compiler its easy for you, and helps you
earn 1000000 dollars, would it be a waste? Its all in how you use it to
consider it a waste... or the best investment ever. "Its all in the waist."
If i dont like PureBasic, or i find it too hard to use, it will be a waste of
time and money
For me.
I dont know how speed compares (and to be honest i dont care, i think
those are "compiler-religious" ways to think of something that should be used for work only) between PureBasic and PowerBasic.
I have found that most of the speed in a program depends on the programmer, and very few times in the compiler. Yeah yeah... Someone will say "This one can count to 1 trillion in 2 milliseconds..." or stuff like that... But lets get real, a program that counts to 1 trillion is useless. For test purposes only? Maybe... But i still dont care much.
My Second cent is:
Anyway... i dont see why should it be a "war" Purebasic has its users and
Powerbasic has its users, it doesnt mean one must choose one or another.
why not use both... or the one you like best?
I am considering (and already working with someone on this forum) to
create Demos for my Powerbasic products to be used in PureBasic.

So, i expect many people tests my product when it is available for Purebasic.
Oh by the way... be nice to me and point me to a place where i can
test drive PureBasic... The (demo?) copy i got doesnt run too well in this
PC.
Elias

[/i]