NS Basic a good number two?
- utopiomania
- Addict
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
- Location: Norway
NS Basic a good number two?
Anyone tried this Basic language? I am probably going to buy a licence for it if nothing
bad turns up.
It's based on a subset of Visual Basic, and compiles .vbs files to single file exe's, and
is said to be 'Object Based' rather than 'Object Orientated'...
What they mean by that is that it doesn't support inheritance & polyporpherism, but it
supports classes, methods, properties, (de+)constructors and so on, so I figure it's a
nice modern language after all, and the company seems good too.
What do you say about this? Anyone tried it?
bad turns up.
It's based on a subset of Visual Basic, and compiles .vbs files to single file exe's, and
is said to be 'Object Based' rather than 'Object Orientated'...
What they mean by that is that it doesn't support inheritance & polyporpherism, but it
supports classes, methods, properties, (de+)constructors and so on, so I figure it's a
nice modern language after all, and the company seems good too.
What do you say about this? Anyone tried it?
Is NS Basic not a language for PalmOS?
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

- utopiomania
- Addict
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
- Location: Norway
I have ordered the demo, will test it 

PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

The phrase "number two" has a slightly different meaning here in the USA. Based on our meaning, I think NS Basic is indeed a good "number two".NS Basic a good number two?
Tried it for Palm development and wasn't overly impressed. Perhaps thew desktop version is better, but I think there are probably better alternatives for Windows development.
It does use a couple of runtime libraries (depending on your application) and some of the wrappers for common libraries are based on COM; e.g. SQLite. Must admit that I've kept an eye on it, but haven't really been tempted as yet.
If you want an OOP basic, have a look at HotBasic.
If you want an OOP basic, have a look at HotBasic.
I may look like a mule, but I'm not a complete ass.
The Installer of the Demo is bad, can't run the IDE without error. It's not a
native Compiler, only a Interpreter or Tokenizer, it's nothing for me
native Compiler, only a Interpreter or Tokenizer, it's nothing for me
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.

- utopiomania
- Addict
- Posts: 1655
- Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
- Location: Norway
Oops, I must admit you all gave someething to think about here. I was about to register, but I think I'll download
the demo and check it out again before I make a decicion.
Btw, there's a good listing of basic compilers here: http://basic.mindteq.com/ with a short review of all of them.
the demo and check it out again before I make a decicion.
Btw, there's a good listing of basic compilers here: http://basic.mindteq.com/ with a short review of all of them.