My thoughts about object oriented programming

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:38 pm

PWNED!!

Num3 · Post by **Num3** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:01 pm

Yup

Btw, nice vibes from the station on your signature!

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:02 pm

But the finger could be made better!

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 8:27 pm

Btw, nice vibes from the station on your signature!

Indeed! The only true house music station (IMHO)!

But the finger could be made better!

LMFAO! The finger is cheap as hell but the idea is incredible!

WishMaster · Post by **WishMaster** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:21 pm

If PB would support OOP we could easily use great thirt-party libs like Qt...

ricardo · Post by **ricardo** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:40 pm

Its not against the forum rules to misuse (abuse?) the PB pet??

ts-soft · Post by **ts-soft** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 9:41 pm

WishMaster wrote:If PB would support OOP we could easily use great thirt-party libs like Qt...

Object Orientated Programming != using OOP libs written in c++

utopiomania · Post by **utopiomania** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 10:19 pm

You asked for it! I like OOP, here's an example of a class calling an instance of itself:

WishMaster · Post by **WishMaster** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:01 pm

ts-soft wrote:Object Orientated Programming != using OOP libs written in c++

Of course, but it would be much easier.

Kaeru Gaman · Post by **Kaeru Gaman** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:47 pm

utopiomania wrote:You asked for it! I like OOP, here's an example of a class calling an instance of itself:

AHHHH, I'M BLINDED! *PUKE*

btw @Topic:
perhaps some don't know this link
http://www.geocities.com/tablizer/oopbad.htm

merihevonen · Post by **merihevonen** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:52 pm

Lol.. I like Semi-OOP style programming..

Something like this:

Code: Select all

Type Object
 x.l
 y.l
 z.l
 sp.l
End Type

Character=Object()
..
If Character\x=5
 MessageRequester("","ERROR")
End If

Remove Character
Remove Object()

So.. half procedural and half OO.. that would be very good indeed..

ts-soft · Post by **ts-soft** » Wed Feb 28, 2007 11:57 pm

WishMaster wrote:
ts-soft wrote:Object Orientated Programming != using OOP libs written in c++
Of course, but it would be much easier.

I using XProfan with OOP Support, but for using OOP-Like libs is PB much
easier