Forum suggestion

Got an idea for enhancing PureBasic? New command(s) you'd like to see?
Heathen
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:54 pm
Location: At my pc coding..

Forum suggestion

Post by Heathen »

Could you guys either switch forum software or at least update phpbb and use some sort of anti-bot hack?

This forum really needs it and would save the mods time of having to delete the spam.
thanks
I love Purebasic.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by PB »

Agreed.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
User avatar
Fluid Byte
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2336
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:41 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by Fluid Byte »

Heathen wrote:Could you guys either switch forum software or at least update phpbb and use some sort of anti-bot hack?

This forum really needs it and would save the mods time of having to delete the spam.
thanks
Pointless! Altough I agree that we need some decent, common bot protection you should be aware that in the end it's just a matter of time 'till bot authors adapt to it. If they want to "hack" the forum, they will.
Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit / Whose Hoff is it anyway?
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by PB »

> Pointless!

Not really. Any protection is better than none, and as far as I know there's no
protection here at all? Numerous times there's been discussion to add graphic
verification here (which phpBB supports) but it's never been added for some
unknown reason.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Heathen
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:54 pm
Location: At my pc coding..

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by Heathen »

PB wrote:> Pointless!

Not really. Any protection is better than none, and as far as I know there's no
protection here at all? Numerous times there's been discussion to add graphic
verification here (which phpBB supports) but it's never been added for some
unknown reason.
There already is visual confirmation for registration, but bots can already compensate for that now. The best way is to hide the fact that its phpbb by editing the theme accordingly.. Keep in mind, these bots are automatic and they search for specific keywords in the theme.
I love Purebasic.
DarkDragon
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2344
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DarkDragon »

Why not switch to the old forums? They are better and no bot is interessted in old forum software.

http://forum.snitz.com/
bye,
Daniel
Berikco
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1326
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Berikco »

There are some anti bot mods installed of course...
But there is no mod that keep the forum clean without human intervention
KarLKoX
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 681
Joined: Mon Oct 06, 2003 7:13 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by KarLKoX »

PB wrote:> Pointless!

Not really. Any protection is better than none, and as far as I know there's no
protection here at all? Numerous times there's been discussion to add graphic
verification here (which phpBB supports) but it's never been added for some
unknown reason.
Spam support OCR for a long time now so yes, the forum need this protection but will also need human support.
"Qui baise trop bouffe un poil." P. Desproges

http://karlkox.blogspot.com/
Berikco
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1326
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Post by Berikco »

Pointless discussion...

Better chapta is already installed some months ago.

And some other mods to keep bots out.

But you can nevver protect against manual added spam.
Brice Manuel

Post by Brice Manuel »

Anybody who has been around for a while knows the amount of trouble we have had with the forums over the years. Crashing, going down, inaccessible for days if not longer (Didn't it crash one time while Fred was on a two week vacation?).

I don't like the spammers, but they are easy to ignore. The forums have been VERY stable for a while now, don't go messing with the forums and changing or adding anything that might even remotely break them and make them unreliable. :lol:
ricardo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2438
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:06 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by ricardo »

PB wrote:> Pointless!

Not really. Any protection is better than none, and as far as I know there's no
protection here at all? Numerous times there's been discussion to add graphic
verification here (which phpBB supports) but it's never been added for some
unknown reason.
Solution i have seen in other forums:

-Add graphic verification
-Users with less that 25 posts cant have signature, url in the profile or post urls as part fo the messages

And bots and spammers will forget this forum.
User avatar
Kaeru Gaman
Addict
Addict
Posts: 4826
Joined: Sun Mar 19, 2006 1:57 pm
Location: Germany

Post by Kaeru Gaman »

ricardo wrote:-Add graphic verification
Berikco wrote:Better chapta is already installed some months ago.
it's captcha, and it's exactly what you think about.
oh... and have a nice day.
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by PB »

> Users with less that 25 posts cant have signature, url in the profile or post
> urls as part fo the messages

That would be a very good idea, actually.

As for graphic verification: I'd seen posts asking for it, but nothing announcing
that it had been done, so I naturally assumed it wasn't implemented yet. Good
to hear that it has been.
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
Heathen
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 498
Joined: Tue Sep 27, 2005 6:54 pm
Location: At my pc coding..

Post by Heathen »

One forum I was a member of got rid of the whole auto-bot problem by mod rewriting the registration url to a different one.
I love Purebasic.
Berikco
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 1326
Joined: Wed Apr 23, 2003 7:57 pm
Location: Belgium
Contact:

Re: Forum suggestion

Post by Berikco »

> Users with less that 25 posts cant have signature, url in the profile or post
> urls as part fo the messages

That would be a very good idea, actually.

Well, guess what, new users need 10 posts here to have a signature or url in there profile...
Better look at the registration page first before requesting something...you guys are all to late :lol: :twisted:

You can also see the new color captcha, original it was b/w
Bots registering as fake users has dropped to almost zero the last 3 months.

Image
Post Reply