Really good protection system?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
ricardo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2438
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:06 pm
Location: Argentina

Re: lol

Post by ricardo »

Sabour wrote:this is nice , execryptor site blocking all access from my country ip (indonesia) redirect into a page titled "Invalid Request" and with bunch of piracy 'lesson',wtf ?? it's new kind of stereotyping? lol they loose 1 potential customer.i will e-mail them :evil: :(
i have tried 2 isp in here,BOTH of them got blocked so i assume all of my country!,when trying use the proxy works fine :/
this is bad for business
This address is the one that you are talking about http://www.strongbit.com/execryptor.asp ?
Sabour
User
User
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am

no

Post by Sabour »

no all of the site,they said because of high fraudelent activity,lol , now they removed my ban using a special page,i can access now but still bored for this stereotyping crap,now our country very concern about this fraud crap,many of them got jailed for atleast 2 year even 5 year!
merihevonen
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 326
Joined: Mon Jan 01, 2007 7:20 pm

Post by merihevonen »

Looking through all these pages I didn't find the "best" protection system.. is there something like that??
User avatar
utopiomania
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1655
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by utopiomania »

Until proven otherwise, I think the best protection system is a combination of good protection in
the program itself, and then let ExeCryptor virtualize the parts of the code where the protection
is.
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

utopiomania wrote:Until proven otherwise, I think the best protection system is a combination of good protection in
the program itself, and then let ExeCryptor virtualize the parts of the code where the protection
is.
And execrypter is probably not the only thin you can use ;)
Sabour
User
User
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am

hmm

Post by Sabour »

i tried the trial version,it seem didn't work with pb 4.02 :( , anyone manage to make it work?

Image
User avatar
utopiomania
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1655
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by utopiomania »

I haven't tried with 4.02 myself, but there's a general how-to with PureBasic here:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... execryptor

not for 4.02 but it might be helpful.
ricardo
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2438
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 7:06 pm
Location: Argentina

Post by ricardo »

For code virtualization im using Code Virtualizer. Works very fine with PB but i havent tested with real world crackers (i will do this week when release my app!) and i hope it work as expected :)
Sabour
User
User
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am

hmm

Post by Sabour »

are you sure their product still reliable even their topliner product "themida" has been out on the scene the keygen for the latest retail version :(,of course we cann't judge the other product fail but cmon code virtualizer could be stripped down version of themida? anyway really insteresting price for such tool
Sabour
User
User
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am

hmm

Post by Sabour »

utopiomania wrote:I haven't tried with 4.02 myself, but there's a general how-to with PureBasic here:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... execryptor

not for 4.02 but it might be helpful.
i even cann't compile the example app in the sdk :(
MrMat
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 762
Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:27 am
Location: England

Post by MrMat »

Unfortunately the code PB generates has changed in 4.02 and it no longer works. I cannot think of an elegant way to fix it so fingers crossed Fred will revert the change or someone will come up with a good solution. I posted an explanation of the change in the thread mentioned above.
Mat
User avatar
utopiomania
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1655
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by utopiomania »

StrongBit is working to fix this ASAP :)
Sabour
User
User
Posts: 31
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 7:41 am

lol

Post by Sabour »

Code Virtualizer has been defeated :/,oh nose which do i need? :evil:
User avatar
utopiomania
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1655
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 10:00 pm
Location: Norway

Post by utopiomania »

Code Virtualizer has been defeated
Code Virtualizer seems to me to be one of those who changes the scheme each time you compile
an app protected with them, so my question is:

A) Is the generic method defeated once and for all, or
B) did someone manage to crack an instance of an app protected using Code Virtualizer?

If A) it's serious, if B) it's probably no problem.

In either case, someone is making a living out of these protectors, and some believe in them
for their own profit, so I think some ACCURACY is needed here when you post statements like
that?
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

utopiomania wrote: if B) it's probably no problem.
It just proofs that nothing is undefeatable. Sure its a problem, but its smaller than A)
Post Reply