CPU SPEED
- NoahPhense
- Addict
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:30 pm
- Location: North Florida
Please keep in mind, that I'm working with a laptop processor. So, when
I put the laptop in Laptop/Portable mode, the processor drops to a
Dynamic 50%. Meaning that for all normal applications, a 2.16ghz dual
core processor will drop to 1.08ghz, meaning .54 ghz each core. (540).
Some other CPU apps on the net can see this. Even the windows built-in
perfmon.msc can see this. Even some of the code already posted here
has been able to detect this, in debug mode in PB. But after creating an
exe, it flys back to full power.
?
- np
I put the laptop in Laptop/Portable mode, the processor drops to a
Dynamic 50%. Meaning that for all normal applications, a 2.16ghz dual
core processor will drop to 1.08ghz, meaning .54 ghz each core. (540).
Some other CPU apps on the net can see this. Even the windows built-in
perfmon.msc can see this. Even some of the code already posted here
has been able to detect this, in debug mode in PB. But after creating an
exe, it flys back to full power.
?
Code: Select all
Declare AppendFile(FileName.s, String.s)
Global Fn = 99
Enumeration 1
#Window_frm_main
EndEnumeration
#WindowIndex=#PB_Compiler_EnumerationValue
Enumeration 1
;Window_frm_main
#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main
EndEnumeration
#GadgetIndex=#PB_Compiler_EnumerationValue
Procedure.l Window_frm_main()
If OpenWindow(#Window_frm_main,212,145,192,45,"CPU Speed Recorder",#PB_Window_SystemMenu|#PB_Window_ScreenCentered|#PB_Window_Invisible)
If CreateGadgetList(WindowID(#Window_frm_main))
TextGadget(#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main,10,10,130,25,"DATA")
SetGadgetFont(#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main,LoadFont(#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main,"@Arial Unicode MS",14,0))
HideWindow(#Window_frm_main,0)
ProcedureReturn WindowID(#Window_frm_main)
EndIf
EndIf
EndProcedure
Procedure.q GetCycleCount()
!rdtsc
ProcedureReturn
EndProcedure
Procedure CPUSPEED()
Protected A.q
Protected B.q
A = GetCycleCount()
Sleep_(100)
B = GetCycleCount()
ProcedureReturn (B-A) / 100000
EndProcedure
Procedure AppendFile(FileName.s, String.s)
If OpenFile(Fn, FileName)
FileSeek(Fn, Lof(Fn))
WriteStringN(Fn, String)
CloseFile(Fn)
EndIf
EndProcedure
Procedure Tick()
dData.s = FormatDate("%hh:%ii:%ss", Date())
cData.s = Str(CPUSPEED())
finalData.s = dData + " - " + cData
; AppendFile("cpu.log", finalData)
Debug finalData
SetGadgetText(#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main, cData)
EndProcedure
If Window_frm_main()
quitfrm_main=0
SetGadgetText(#Gadget_frm_main_txt_main, "**")
SetTimer_(WindowID(#Window_frm_main), 1, 1000, @Tick())
Repeat
EventID =WaitWindowEvent()
MenuID =EventMenu()
GadgetID =EventGadget()
WindowID =EventWindow()
Select EventID
Case #PB_Event_CloseWindow
If WindowID=#Window_frm_main
quitfrm_main=1
EndIf
Case #PB_Event_Gadget
Select GadgetID
EndSelect
EndSelect
Until quitfrm_main
KillTimer_(WindowID(#Window_frm_main), 1)
CloseWindow(#Window_frm_main)
EndIf
End
netmaestro it is a wonder your code is reliable at all.
That is the high performance crystal timing frequency and not related to MHz at all.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/defau ... ounter.asp
On my AMD the returned value of QueryPerformanceCounter Function is 3579545 and thus result in 3 after that divide.
That is the high performance crystal timing frequency and not related to MHz at all.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/defau ... ounter.asp
On my AMD the returned value of QueryPerformanceCounter Function is 3579545 and thus result in 3 after that divide.
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog
- Posts: 8451
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
Rescator, you misread the function call. You reference QueryPerformanceCounter, where my code uses QueryPerformanceFrequency:
which seems like it should work, and it does on all my machines. I don't know why it doesn't work on some machines, but I guess it's not too reliable.MSDN wrote:QueryPerformanceFrequency Function
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The QueryPerformanceFrequency function retrieves the frequency of the high-resolution performance counter, if one exists. The frequency cannot change while the system is running.
Syntax
BOOL QueryPerformanceFrequency( LARGE_INTEGER *lpFrequency
);
Parameters
lpFrequency
[out] Pointer to a variable that receives the current performance-counter frequency, in counts per second. If the installed hardware does not support a high-resolution performance counter, this parameter can be zero.
BERESHEIT
QueryPerformanceFrequency is used to get the resolution of the high-resolution performance counter,netmaestro wrote:Rescator, you misread the function call. You reference QueryPerformanceCounter, where my code uses QueryPerformanceFrequency
which seems like it should work, and it does on all my machines. I don't know why it doesn't work on some machines, but I guess it's not too reliable.
the returned value is then used with QueryPerformanceCounter result to calculate the time passed.
QueryPerformanceFrequency has nothing to do with the cpu or MHz of the cpu,
it is related to the highest resolution performance counter,
in your case the pentium systems use the cpu cycle counter,
in the case of AMD cpu's most use either a cpu speed independent crystal/counter, or a external clock (bios)
and in the case of scientific equipment it could even be a atomic clock/timer device.
PS! Unless I'm mistaken, cpu cycles themselves are unreliable for MHz
(millions of instructions per second) meassurement as some cpu's are
able to execute multiple instructions in a single cycle.
Which is why benchmark tools use MIPS and FLOPS rather
than MHz in it's comparison tests.
It would be fun however to do a NOPS benchmark routine:P
Sorry, couldn't resist a little asm joke there, hope some of you got it

- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog
- Posts: 8451
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
I think the most reliable (and fast) way is to look in the registry. That'll tell you what Windows has been able to determine as well as how many cores you have. The idea I posted is no good at all. Those methods based on RDTSC are OK for single-core processors but they return unreliable results on multi-core systems. For example, my 2.0 ghz AMD 3800 X2 is reporting 2200 mhz, which isn't right. I have 2 cores each going 2000 mhz, so 2200 isn't a useful number.
BERESHEIT
Found out that you get more reliable results when you increase the time:
at least on my machines.
Code: Select all
Procedure CPUSPEED()
Protected A.q
Protected B.q
A = GetCycleCount()
Sleep_(1500)
B = GetCycleCount()
ProcedureReturn (B-A) / 1500000
EndProcedure
- NoahPhense
- Addict
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:30 pm
- Location: North Florida
Ok, one more time. The registry is great for seeing what your "max"
cpu speed is. But useless to determine what your process is currently
running at.
A laptop in Portable/Laptop does NOT run at full speed. It runs about
half speed. In Home/Office Desk, it runs in full cpu mode.
While a laptop is in Portable/Laptop (power setting), it can run full, but
only when the demand is there.
i.e. If I'm doing Word, Excel, etc.. system runs about 50% of total mhz.
The second I launch a game, the processor will run full.
- np
cpu speed is. But useless to determine what your process is currently
running at.
A laptop in Portable/Laptop does NOT run at full speed. It runs about
half speed. In Home/Office Desk, it runs in full cpu mode.
While a laptop is in Portable/Laptop (power setting), it can run full, but
only when the demand is there.
i.e. If I'm doing Word, Excel, etc.. system runs about 50% of total mhz.
The second I launch a game, the processor will run full.
- np
Dunno if Windows 2000/above-only code is any use to you, but if it is, take a look at this and see if it works for you:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=25310
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=25310
- NoahPhense
- Addict
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:30 pm
- Location: North Florida
That's freakin perfect.Hi-Toro wrote:Dunno if Windows 2000/above-only code is any use to you, but if it is, take a look at this and see if it works for you:
http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtopic.php?t=25310
Thanks HT!
- np