Do you guys think im nuts?

CadeX · Post by **CadeX** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:19 pm

Because im planning on using PureBasic with apache webserver?

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:42 pm

So what?

CadeX · Post by **CadeX** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:48 pm

My friend thinks i'm nuts... i think its just an alternative so i don't have to learn a new language.

dracflamloc · Post by **dracflamloc** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 4:54 pm

I dont see any problem with it...?

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:18 pm

I agree. I don't see any problems with using PB with Apache.
Are you thinking of CGI?

Killswitch · Post by **Killswitch** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:20 pm

I think you're nuts for thinking that we'd think your nuts (considering this: http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... hasselhoff). Does that count?

GeoTrail · Post by **GeoTrail** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:21 pm

thamarok · Post by **thamarok** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 5:23 pm

You may think I'm nuts!
I have cloned many PureBasic functions to PHP and I am planning to make PureBasic Server Edition (ofcourse if Fred allows to)... The PHP will get executed on the server and the parsed result will get shown to the user, so people won't get to know that the server has PureBasic (actually the PB Server Edition is just a set of PHP commands that behave similarily like the PB ones)

.

With this, people could do PureBasic stuff and use my PHP script to use it in their webservers without doing CGI stuff and embedding the PBCompiler!

ricardo · Post by **ricardo** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:10 pm

Why not develop a PB for mobile devices???

Of course the PB server edition is nice too...

Bonne_den_kule · Post by **Bonne_den_kule** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:37 pm

Killswitch wrote:I think you're nuts for thinking that we'd think your nuts (considering this: http://www.purebasic.fr/english/viewtop ... hasselhoff). Does that count?

Fluid Byte · Post by **Fluid Byte** » Wed Oct 18, 2006 6:53 pm

Whahahahaha!

That shit is hilarious!!

CadeX · Post by **CadeX** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:05 am

I have considered this topic, hi-jacked.

Pantcho!! · Post by **Pantcho!!** » Thu Oct 19, 2006 8:54 am

Don't reinvent the wheel!!
I use PB to create my CGI's, you can check out my homepage, fully loaded with PB cgi's and SAMBAR server.

The big "-" with creating PB CGI's is that you cant use it with hosting companies! only on your own home PC.

so i run my server from home and it works great and fast.

To create CGI libs you can get Paul CGI_LIB, it does EVERYTHING you need to create CGI's - http://www.reelmedia.org/cgi-bin/PurePr ... es&sub=ASM

good day.

Intrigued · Post by **Intrigued** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 2:50 am

thamarok wrote:You may think I'm nuts!
I have cloned many PureBasic functions to PHP and I am planning to make PureBasic Server Edition (ofcourse if Fred allows to)... The PHP will get executed on the server and the parsed result will get shown to the user, so people won't get to know that the server has PureBasic (actually the PB Server Edition is just a set of PHP commands that behave similarily like the PB ones) .

With this, people could do PureBasic stuff and use my PHP script to use it in their webservers without doing CGI stuff and embedding the PBCompiler!

That would be useful for sure!

thamarok · Post by **thamarok** » Fri Oct 20, 2006 8:00 pm

Intrigued wrote:
thamarok wrote:You may think I'm nuts!
I have cloned many PureBasic functions to PHP and I am planning to make PureBasic Server Edition (ofcourse if Fred allows to)... The PHP will get executed on the server and the parsed result will get shown to the user, so people won't get to know that the server has PureBasic (actually the PB Server Edition is just a set of PHP commands that behave similarily like the PB ones) .

With this, people could do PureBasic stuff and use my PHP script to use it in their webservers without doing CGI stuff and embedding the PBCompiler!
That would be useful for sure!

Yes, the development on this is a bit slow, but that's because it's hard to make the functions act like the PureBasic ones. But still, it is fun