KGB Archiver, A flop?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
User avatar
Fluid Byte
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2336
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 4:41 am
Location: Berlin, Germany

Post by Fluid Byte »

LMFAO! You are sick Joakim ! :lol:

Now admit that secret relationship to the 'Hoff! :twisted:
Windows 10 Pro, 64-Bit / Whose Hoff is it anyway?
THCM
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:06 pm
Location: Gummersbach - Germany
Contact:

Post by THCM »

Just take a look here: http://www.maximumcompression.com/
WinRK and Paq8 are the best compressors when size matters. KGB isn't as good as the best. There is also a nice comparison ranked on efficiency where WinRAR is one of the best.
The Human Code Machine / Masters' Design Group
Werner Bergmans
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Werner Bergmans »

THCM wrote:Just take a look here: http://www.maximumcompression.com/
WinRK and Paq8 are the best compressors when size matters. KGB isn't as good as the best. There is also a nice comparison ranked on efficiency where WinRAR is one of the best.
In fact KGB is just an older version of PAQ (PAQ6v2) with a GUI on top of it. If you want the best possible compression you indeed have to look to PAQ8 (command-line) or WinRK (GUI).

PAQ8 has some nice tricks however like compressing embedded JPG images in DOC/XLS files etc.
THCM
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 276
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:06 pm
Location: Gummersbach - Germany
Contact:

Post by THCM »

Hi Werner! I like your page very much! How did you get here?
The Human Code Machine / Masters' Design Group
Werner Bergmans
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Werner Bergmans »

THCM wrote:Hi Werner! I like your page very much! How did you get here?
Thanks!. I had a look at the log files to see where the visitors of my site are comming from. I saw a lot of refering sites I did not know, this was one of them... :)
thefool
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5875
Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2003 5:58 pm
Location: Denmark

Post by thefool »

Based on testings myself i see that WinRK actually do archieve a good compression ratio; and its pretty fast too.

Also thanks for the site; i find this stuff interesting :)
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

Cant find gunzi/gunzip2 or bunzip2? do you only test windows software?
Werner Bergmans
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Werner Bergmans »

Nik wrote:Cant find gunzi/gunzip2 or bunzip2? do you only test windows software?
Yes, I test only programs that run under windows. But many of the *nix programs are ported to Windows. I did test Gzip, Bzip2 etc.

The programs you mention are decompressors, not the actual compressors.
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

Well you use the short form to compress and the long form to decompress, e.g. gzip2 and gunzip2, how good are they compared to the windows tools?
Werner Bergmans
New User
New User
Posts: 4
Joined: Sun Sep 24, 2006 2:45 pm
Location: Eindhoven, Netherlands
Contact:

Post by Werner Bergmans »

Nik wrote:Well you use the short form to compress and the long form to decompress, e.g. gzip2 and gunzip2, how good are they compared to the windows tools?
Not too good, have a look at gzip, bzip2 in the webpage below. Believe it or not, but compression is one of those application types where all research takes place on Windows Pc's. The last couple of years there were some major breakthroughs in compression caused by first PPM(d) and later the new PAQ context modeling algorithms.

http://www.maximumcompression.com/data/summary_sf.php
Post Reply