garretthylltun wrote:Wow! Now I don't have to watch "General Hospital" or "All My Children"
anymore!![]()
-Garrett
Shocking rumor regarding Fred's absence...
-
dracflamloc
- Addict

- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact:
Sure compared to powerbasic, but have you seen the GDC or other such open source projects newgroups and changelogs? Its constant bugfixes and updates. Speed is all relative so I guess it'll depend who you're comparing it to. Personally I think Fred does an amazing job cranking out what he does with such limited resources, I was just saying... relative to certain alternatives its fairly slow.PB wrote:> The slow pace of development
Slow? You're kidding, right? PureBasic has one of the fastest update rates
that I've ever seen for ANY software package, and I have quite a few!
Closest example: Some PowerBasic updates take over a YEAR to occur.
Look at PureBasic's update history and they're every 3 months or so.
I mean DarkBasic took AGES to update and have more resources than Fred, yet their product is crap. I'm not saying Fred needs to work faster (*cracks whip*), but he could definitely use some help.
-
White Eagle
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 215
- Joined: Sun Jan 04, 2004 3:38 am
- Location: Maryland
@dracflamloc:
> I think if Fred could expand to just 1 more developer on the libraries and compiler it'd really improve their progress a lot.
Hellooo, this is the second developer speaking!
Ok, i'm no fulltime man, but chances are very high that you'll be executing some code i wrote if you do something with PB
@Kale:
No hard feelings at all there from our side.
I'd just like to get some more proof with any further such statements
Now peace everyone!
(sorry to those with certain girlfriends)
> I think if Fred could expand to just 1 more developer on the libraries and compiler it'd really improve their progress a lot.
Hellooo, this is the second developer speaking!
Ok, i'm no fulltime man, but chances are very high that you'll be executing some code i wrote if you do something with PB
@Kale:
No hard feelings at all there from our side.
I'd just like to get some more proof with any further such statements
Now peace everyone!
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
-
SoulReaper
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 372
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:14 am
- Location: England
@Freak
Respect, all I want to see and forgive me for say these aweful words...
I just want Pure Basic to be better then Dar* Basic I think you know what I mean - I already think it is, but it does lacks on the 3d side...
and of course some tweaks...
now if that was done - well I dont think that there would be much to stop Pure Basic being a #1 seller - also a revamp of the web site would attract a lot of new customers...
apps wise it rocks
just my point of view
Regards
Kevin
Respect, all I want to see and forgive me for say these aweful words...
I just want Pure Basic to be better then Dar* Basic I think you know what I mean - I already think it is, but it does lacks on the 3d side...
and of course some tweaks...
now if that was done - well I dont think that there would be much to stop Pure Basic being a #1 seller - also a revamp of the web site would attract a lot of new customers...
apps wise it rocks
just my point of view
Regards
Kevin
I second that, but only because you said:PB wrote:> The slow pace of development
Slow? You're kidding, right? PureBasic has one of the fastest update rates
that I've ever seen for ANY software package, and I have quite a few!
Closest example: Some PowerBasic updates take over a YEAR to occur.
Look at PureBasic's update history and they're every 3 months or so.
I own more than 1 commercial programming language and have to say that the support/bugfix-release of another one is done withhin hours. It's the fastest I've ever seen.PB wrote:... one of the fastest update rates...
PS. And yes, I have lifetime updates with this one too
Took a look at D last week and have to say that D has a lot of appealing stuff. The guy that wrote it has a lot of experience, he wrote several C++ compilers. D is like C++ done right.dracflamloc wrote:... It's led me to start considering other options like the D language when planning out a project.
-
dracflamloc
- Addict

- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact:
Guess I'm misinformed but I thought you worked on the IDE? I'm talking about the compiler features here..?freak wrote:@dracflamloc:
> I think if Fred could expand to just 1 more developer on the libraries and compiler it'd really improve their progress a lot.
Hellooo, this is the second developer speaking!
Ok, i'm no fulltime man, but chances are very high that you'll be executing some code i wrote if you do something with PB
@Kale:
No hard feelings at all there from our side.
I'd just like to get some more proof with any further such statements
Now peace everyone!(sorry to those with certain girlfriends)
-
dracflamloc
- Addict

- Posts: 1648
- Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
- Contact:
Well I actually use the GNU D compiler. Gotta support the open source all the way, but yea the digital mars guy is very good.fsw wrote:Took a look at D last week and have to say that D has a lot of appealing stuff. The guy that wrote it has a lot of experience, he wrote several C++ compilers. D is like C++ done right.dracflamloc wrote:... It's led me to start considering other options like the D language when planning out a project.
> I second that, but only because you said:
> that the support/bugfix-release of another one is done withhin hours.
Hehe, what do you think those many bug-fixed beta libs that Fred pumps out
are? They're don't get counted as "official" updates even though they actually
are. Has everyone forgotten about those? :roll: Sometimes you can be speaking
to Fred on IRC about a bug and he'll do a quick bug fix lib for you try out, in
REAL TIME, not HOURS.
It's happened before and no doubt he might keep
doing so in future -- as long as we don't accuse him of "selling out".
I came from a Visual Basic 5 background. What updates did I ever get from
that? Visual Basic 6, which I would have had to pay for. But I didn't; I bought
PureBasic instead. And did Bill Gates or Microsoft ever add features or fixes
that I requested? No way. Fred did. Fred's doing an excellent job. He rocks!
> I own more than 1 commercial programming language and have to say... one of the fastest update rates...
> that the support/bugfix-release of another one is done withhin hours.
Hehe, what do you think those many bug-fixed beta libs that Fred pumps out
are? They're don't get counted as "official" updates even though they actually
are. Has everyone forgotten about those? :roll: Sometimes you can be speaking
to Fred on IRC about a bug and he'll do a quick bug fix lib for you try out, in
REAL TIME, not HOURS.
doing so in future -- as long as we don't accuse him of "selling out".
I came from a Visual Basic 5 background. What updates did I ever get from
that? Visual Basic 6, which I would have had to pay for. But I didn't; I bought
PureBasic instead. And did Bill Gates or Microsoft ever add features or fixes
that I requested? No way. Fred did. Fred's doing an excellent job. He rocks!
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.


