Anyone want to help make a 'PureMessenger'?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Anyone want to help make a 'PureMessenger'?

Post by lexvictory »

Is there anyone on here who is interested in helping to make an IM app that can support a few different protocols?

I was thinking along the lines of MSN, ICQ/AIM, Jabber, Yahho Messenger(?), and maybe IRC.

If this does get off the ground, a better name suggestion is welcomed :D
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

PureMessenger sounds like a cool name ;)
I might be interested in such a project, the first thing we need to do is to get good documentation for each protocol.

Here is some for msn:
Protocol documentation:
http://msnpiki.msnfanatic.com/index.php/Main_Page
http://www.hypothetic.org/docs/msn/index.php
http://www.venkydude.com/articles/msn.htm (also have a vb example)
Sourcecode/examples:
http://www.codeproject.com/vb/net/TcpCl ... otocol.asp
http://addons.miranda-im.org/details.ph ... le&id=1920
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
Pantcho!!
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 538
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 3:43 am
Location: Israel
Contact:

Post by Pantcho!! »

I dont have all the time for this kind of project,
but count me in as for little backup. :)
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

If we set up a Wiki page for this project then everyone can contribute.
What sort of project do you want, open source or private?
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by lexvictory »

i think open source...

i was also thinking of using threads in dlls for the protocol connections, how does that sound? (they would manage their own chat windows)
I think thread are needed because of having more than 1 protocol connected at the same time
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
Killswitch
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 731
Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:12 pm

Post by Killswitch »

Wouldn't it better to start off with one protocol (say MSN, it is the most popular afterall) and then expand from there?
~I see one problem with your reasoning: the fact is thats not a chicken~
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by lexvictory »

that was my original idea, although i didnt mention it....
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

Would be nice, but MSN protocol is KAOS !!!

I've tried it up once, but i quitted once i realized how many protocol codes there are...

I miss old MSN protocols.... LOL
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by lexvictory »

Num3 wrote:Would be nice, but MSN protocol is KAOS !!!

I've tried it up once, but i quitted once i realized how many protocol codes there are...

I miss old MSN protocols.... LOL
would u like to help with a different protocol? (or ure not interested in helping at all? :lol: )
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
Num3
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 2812
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 4:51 pm
Location: Portugal, Lisbon
Contact:

Post by Num3 »

Sure :twisted:

But it isn't easy!!! (Take a look at MIRANDA IM )
Protocols are getting way too complex nowdays...

New MSN protocol, for example, auths using HTTPS !
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

Num3 wrote:Protocols are getting way too complex nowdays...
Indeed, I don't understand why they want everything to be so complex and "bloated" :P
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by lexvictory »

Num3 wrote: New MSN protocol, for example, auths using HTTPS !
U mean msnp13? or one of the older ones?
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
Kaiser
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 118
Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2005 8:36 am

Post by Kaiser »

I once attempted to do my own MSN client, but got blocked in the HTTPS authentication as I didn't know how to do it in PB...

However if this project seems to start off, I guess I can give a hand if it's needed, according to my skills ^^...
Image
lexvictory
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1027
Joined: Sun May 15, 2005 5:15 am
Location: Australia
Contact:

Post by lexvictory »

what version of the msn protocol uses https for auth?
Demonio Ardente

Currently managing Linux & OS X Tailbite
OS X TailBite now up to date with Windows!
Hydrate
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 436
Joined: Mon May 16, 2005 9:37 pm
Contact:

Post by Hydrate »

lexvictory wrote:what version of the msn protocol uses https for auth?
The MSNP8 protocol through to MSNP13. I got as far as the TWN (Tweener) auth, and couldnt do it. It just didnt really get it, or what to do.
.::Image::.
Post Reply