Please release an update of Win32 PB4

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
va!n
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1104
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:48 pm

Please release an update of Win32 PB4

Post by va!n »

Hi Fred,
the v4 release has been a nice release. However in the so called v4 final release are some bugs that should be fixed in some cases, so some people can continue and/or complete projects.

For some bugs some coding gurus may have a way how to use own working replacements done in ASM or with the API. But nobody is really able to find an alternative to solve bugs from the compiler. For example i am talking about the not working /REASM option.

I think you and some other people here know that the comunity found some bugs of the v4 final release... so i think some people like me would be happy to see an official fixed update like release v4.01 or just packing all fixed stuff (like fixed compiler and fixed libs) to one ZIP archive and put it on the download section for registered users.

Until /REASM does not works, PB4 is in some cases useless for my work, sorry. So it would be nice if you think about this request and bringing PureBasic in a better light ;) thanks for your attention and thanks in advance. keep on ya work
va!n aka Thorsten

Intel i7-980X Extreme Edition, 12 GB DDR3, Radeon 5870 2GB, Windows7 x64,
User avatar
Hroudtwolf
Addict
Addict
Posts: 803
Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
Location: Germany(Hessen)
Contact:

Post by Hroudtwolf »

Yes, ists a tragedy.
There are a lot of not reproducable Bugs.

My proposal:
Simply, we forget the last PB-Release and wait for a new.

@Fred and PB-team.
That is not angry against you.
Human does mistakes. ;-)
User avatar
Joakim Christiansen
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2452
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
Location: Norway
Contact:

Post by Joakim Christiansen »

Hroudtwolf wrote:My proposal:
Simply, we forget the last PB-Release and wait for a new.
It's not that bad...
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Trond »

I think threadsafe should be fixed before the Linux version is made with the same problems. (It's more work to correct both versions and it's better with one rock solid threadsafe than two "thread-UNsafe".)

Edit: In either case it would be simple (and a good idea) to release a 4.01 with the current fixes bundled.
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

plus1
dracflamloc
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1648
Joined: Mon Sep 20, 2004 3:52 pm
Contact:

Post by dracflamloc »

Trond wrote:I think threadsafe should be fixed before the Linux version is made with the same problems. (It's more work to correct both versions and it's better with one rock solid threadsafe than two "thread-UNsafe".)

Edit: In either case it would be simple (and a good idea) to release a 4.01 with the current fixes bundled.
I doubt the thread-safe implementation will be the same on linux/windows therefore I doubt it will have the same problems.
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

Well the mechanisms are nearly the same so, some parts will be the same it depends though. Windowstuff is different for example and so is Gadgetstuff.
User avatar
DoubleDutch
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3220
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 7:01 pm
Location: United Kingdom
Contact:

Post by DoubleDutch »

I don't have any problems at all with the current release (and the libs out of the websites beta folder). :)
https://deluxepixel.com <- My Business website
https://reportcomplete.com <- School end of term reports system
Fred
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 18162
Joined: Fri May 17, 2002 4:39 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Fred »

For now, we are concentrating on linux - we can't do all the things at once as some interdependancies are temporary broken. A small update for Windows will be released once Linux will be in alpha or beta stage.
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

Ok I think everybody can live with that, we are all humans and only have (up to) 2 hands and 1 brain so our ressources are somewhat limited... However 1 wish remains, as I'm often on my Linux box I can't always keep up with the beta folder and have to search the forums for the link to it when I'm on my Windows box, it would be nice to have a link to the beta folder in the bug reports sections sitckies, maybe with a commented to try these before reporting a bug, this will also help to sort out already fixed bugs.
Trond
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 7446
Joined: Mon Sep 22, 2003 6:45 pm
Location: Norway

Post by Trond »

purebasic.com/beta, is that so hard to remember?
Nik
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1017
Joined: Fri May 13, 2005 11:45 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by Nik »

got it thanks^^
Shannara
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Emerald Cove, Unformed

Post by Shannara »

hehe, right now its impossible to make multi-threaded apps (for the most part). PB compiler just keeps crashing. So I am really hoping, after the linux version, that we get a stable threaded version of PB for windows :)
SoulReaper
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 372
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:14 am
Location: England

Post by SoulReaper »

great comments on the problems :)

I understand fred & teams time is short...
hey its still a great language, lets not forget all the new stuff and the bugs that have been dealt with so far :)

@va!n yes I do agree with you fully on your above comments... :wink:

I wont comment further as i think the PB team are doing their best and thats all anyone can ask :)

PS I think what fred is trying to do is get a full list of all bugs and then clear them for v4.01 later :twisted: :wink:

Regards
Kevin :wink:
Shannara
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1808
Joined: Thu Oct 30, 2003 11:19 pm
Location: Emerald Cove, Unformed

Post by Shannara »

I like your thinking. And concur, whoo hoo!
Post Reply