well, good night from Denmark. Its too late! cya and sleep well.
Me finally able to make the psi wheel move!
- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
omg, what did I start...
and btw, my hands can be cold and anything, I still get it to spin
Edit: And about you calling me stupid, that's just nice!
Seriously, I respect it!
Because i'm also just like you, I only believe things I got reasons to believe.
But I think it's stupid to think that other people are stupid just because they believe in something that you dont.
and btw, my hands can be cold and anything, I still get it to spin
Edit: And about you calling me stupid, that's just nice!
Seriously, I respect it!
Because i'm also just like you, I only believe things I got reasons to believe.
But I think it's stupid to think that other people are stupid just because they believe in something that you dont.
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
- Psychophanta
- Always Here

- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Anare
- Contact:
- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Exactly!Armoured wrote:Use the force, Luke!
And btw, a video from another person:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=w86hDdUD03o& ... etaphysics
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
Exactly!
The movement of the wheel is a Thermal effect
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Uncovered ... wheel.html
- Joakim Christiansen
- Addict

- Posts: 2452
- Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 4:12 pm
- Location: Norway
- Contact:
Just because that IDIOT says so?Armoured wrote:The movement of the wheel is a Thermal effect
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Uncovered ... wheel.html
I like logic, hence I dislike humans but love computers.
- Psychophanta
- Always Here

- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Anare
- Contact:
Well, that seems a right reasoning. Mmmmhhh! However; is it the same IDIOT and stupid?,Armoured wrote:if you have say this:and then:But I think it's stupid to think that other people are stupid just because they believe in something that you dont.you are stupid! ;DJust because that IDIOT says so?
Joakim Christiansen, you seem a metaphysical lover.
Metaphysics is not another thing that Faith, and
"Faith is not to want to know the true" (My close-friend F. Nietzsche)
OK my opinion:
If all this Telekinese stuff works, why was NOBODY able to proof it? I mean it is not that hard to proof it. I don't 'believe', I need a proof and that's why I do not believe in Religion and all that stuff. Anyways I think calling people stupid believing in religion and co is not right too, they just think in a different way. If someone here is really into religion and he thinks he knows why, I would be really interested, and if someone is really in Telekinese I would also be interessted why he is.
On the other hand you can't trust science too (you can belive in it). I mean they always proofe that the things they made before are wrong, so how can they be right (String-theorie etc...)? Propably Telekinese is really science (100 years ago nobody would have believed in radioactivity).
Maybe the whole universe is made up of small quares randomly moving around and only in this second, or better this millisecond, this squares make up my brain with the information that I am writing a text about crazy stuff, who knows.
So in the Endeffect we have to believe in anything. Science is the thing we can belive in to discribe our live, religion is (good) to give our live a sence (which isn't there from the science point of view), I mean science doesn't care if u kill hundreds of people and the commit suicide but religion does.
This is just my Opinion or maybe not I don't know I just wrote down what was going throught my brain. If someone gives me reasons to change my opinion (and I like them) I have no problem with such a thing...
If all this Telekinese stuff works, why was NOBODY able to proof it? I mean it is not that hard to proof it. I don't 'believe', I need a proof and that's why I do not believe in Religion and all that stuff. Anyways I think calling people stupid believing in religion and co is not right too, they just think in a different way. If someone here is really into religion and he thinks he knows why, I would be really interested, and if someone is really in Telekinese I would also be interessted why he is.
On the other hand you can't trust science too (you can belive in it). I mean they always proofe that the things they made before are wrong, so how can they be right (String-theorie etc...)? Propably Telekinese is really science (100 years ago nobody would have believed in radioactivity).
Maybe the whole universe is made up of small quares randomly moving around and only in this second, or better this millisecond, this squares make up my brain with the information that I am writing a text about crazy stuff, who knows.
So in the Endeffect we have to believe in anything. Science is the thing we can belive in to discribe our live, religion is (good) to give our live a sence (which isn't there from the science point of view), I mean science doesn't care if u kill hundreds of people and the commit suicide but religion does.
This is just my Opinion or maybe not I don't know I just wrote down what was going throught my brain. If someone gives me reasons to change my opinion (and I like them) I have no problem with such a thing...
Apart from that Mrs Lincoln, how was the show?
Ok Konne started to talk about religion too, so let me give my 50 cent.
I think that the strong deny of the existance of god, which sciene seems to believe in, is wrong because it's against the rules of science to ignore a possibility without having proven it false. And this is where the problem comes in, if you want to do an experiment to prove for example an electromagnetic field you need to do at least 1 experiment with the field and 1 without. Well so if you want to prove either the existance of god or the opposite you will need to make an experiment where god can't possibly change the outcome. And this is simply not possible if god is everywhere and can do everything. You can never be sure wether he faked the outcome of your experiment or not. So if god doesn't want to be proven he can't be proven neither can be proven that he doesn't exist.
EDIT: Ok I must admit the tests the guy did are very reasonable, going to repeat them though.
I think that the strong deny of the existance of god, which sciene seems to believe in, is wrong because it's against the rules of science to ignore a possibility without having proven it false. And this is where the problem comes in, if you want to do an experiment to prove for example an electromagnetic field you need to do at least 1 experiment with the field and 1 without. Well so if you want to prove either the existance of god or the opposite you will need to make an experiment where god can't possibly change the outcome. And this is simply not possible if god is everywhere and can do everything. You can never be sure wether he faked the outcome of your experiment or not. So if god doesn't want to be proven he can't be proven neither can be proven that he doesn't exist.
EDIT: Ok I must admit the tests the guy did are very reasonable, going to repeat them though.
Last edited by Nik on Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Visit www.sceneproject.org
