Using EXECryptor with PureBasic

[blueznl]

don't challenge him

but i guess *he* is not the one you should be afraid of, it's the big bad ones out there <insert sweepign motion to the eternal catacombs of the endless web > that you should worry about

if it's good enough, any fool will buy it, so thefool as well

[thefool]

don't challenge him

but i guess *he* is not the one you should be afraid of, it's the big bad ones out there <insert sweepign motion to the eternal catacombs of the endless web > that you should worry about

if it's good enough, any fool will buy it, so thefool as well

hehe
well. if its proven to work, and it works with .net, and its not too expensive, it wouldnt be stupid to buy it (if you have something to protect that is). But first, i gotta finish some products

@utopimania: watch out

[josku_x]

But first, i gotta finnish some products

How can you finnish some products? Do you translate them from english to finnish? That would be great!

Oh, I see you meant 'finish',.. but well, duh..

[thefool]

[BillyColl]

hehe
well. if its proven to work, and it works with .net, and its not too expensive, it wouldnt be stupid to buy it (if you have something to protect that is). But first, i gotta finish some products

@utopimania: watch out

Unfortunately EXECryptor does not work with .Net

[Armoured]

Unfortunately EXECryptor does not work with .Net

Fortunately Purebasic don't use .NET

[BillyColl]

To all who is interested.

EXECryptor http://www.strongbit.com protection next update will be Vista compatible. They announced the beta of the new release is going to be available to registered users.

[dell_jockey]

b.t.w.: what's the current status of the EXECryptor / PB4 combination? Anyone with experience around here? I'd like to know, what tools/scripts to use to use all of the EC API with PB4...

[MrMat]

One way is in ->this<- post. To use it in unicode mode adding W to the end of all the functions should be enough e.g. use EXECryptor_MessageBoxW everywhere.

[dell_jockey]

One way is in ->this<- post. To use it in unicode mode adding W to the end of all the functions should be enough e.g. use EXECryptor_MessageBoxW everywhere.

thanks Mat!

[Sabour]

any new updated pbi files for 4.02?

[MrMat]

PureBasic's generated asm for ProcedureDLL has changed in 4.02 and no longer includes the procedure name as a label, hence the !public directives fail. For instance here is the generated code for a short procedure in 4.01 with the missing line marked:

Code: Select all

; ProcedureDLL addten(somevar.l)
macro MP0{
_Procedure0:
_addten: ; <-- ** This line missing in 4.02 **
  PUSH   ebx
  PS0=12
  XOR    eax,eax
  PUSH   eax                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
; var.l = 10
  MOV    dword [esp],10
; ProcedureReturn somevar + var
  MOV    ebx,dword [esp+PS0+0]
  ADD    ebx,dword [esp]
  MOV    eax,ebx
  JMP   _EndProcedure1
; EndProcedure
  XOR    eax,eax
_EndProcedure1:
  ADD    esp,4
  POP    ebx
  RET    4
}

The only things i can think of are using the _Procedurexx: labels directly (not good since they can easily change - but may work as a quick hack), writing something that processes the generated asm to insert the labels manually (too much work...), wait for someone to come up with a better idea or...

...ask Fred kindly if he doesn't mind adding the labels back in (if there is no reason against it).

I like the last idea

By the way, we cannot insert the label e.g. !_addten: directly into the PureBasic code because it doesn't get inserted at the start of the procedure.

[utopiomania]

StrongBit is working to fix this ASAP

[Sabour]

finally 2 month?

[Micko]

Hi
Someone can tell me the link to download PBCoffee for EXECryptor please ?