POASM: Pelle's assembler

Post by **Dare2** » Fri May 26, 2006 12:13 pm

Has anyone tried this (beta) yet?

http://smorgasbordet.com/phpBB2/viewforum.php?f=17

josku_x · Post by **josku_x** » Fri May 26, 2006 1:44 pm

No, but I have used POLINK and PellesC. POASM sounds pretty good, *but, I hope it won't replace our beloved FAsm

*

El_Choni · Post by **El_Choni** » Fri May 26, 2006 8:34 pm

I hope it doesn't, POASM uses MASM syntax

josku_x · Post by **josku_x** » Fri May 26, 2006 8:46 pm

POASM = Privately Owned Absolute Sea Mud

how does that help us?

LuCiFeR[SD] · Post by **LuCiFeR[SD]** » Fri May 26, 2006 9:33 pm

POASM = People Originally Answered Sensibly Moron.

wcardoso · Post by **wcardoso** » Sat May 27, 2006 4:38 pm

be carefull...may be a POBASIC turn the corner...

Post by **Dare2** » Sat May 27, 2006 5:23 pm

wcardoso wrote:be carefull...may be a POBASIC turn the corner...

Interesting development with the asm bit. If it was cross platform maybe Fantasie Software would have been interested (as Fred is already using POLink).

Nothing wrong with masm, btw. It is pretty good. So is fasm. Gas is a bit of a begger though ...

El_Choni · Post by **El_Choni** » Sat May 27, 2006 5:27 pm

Yep, it's just my personal taste, nothing wrong with masm, as you say.

josku_x · Post by **josku_x** » Sat May 27, 2006 6:49 pm

El_Choni wrote:Yep, it's just my personal taste, nothing wrong with masm, as you say.

I like MASM. Infact, I have MASM32, TASM (registered full version) and FASM (standalone). I work nearly every week with TASM. I like it very much, but it's a bit too expensive. When I work with PB, I always open the PureBasic.asm file and manipulate it, and then I compile it with FASM. And I am working with my friend on a small project which we started using MASM, that's why I work with MASM32 in my spare time.