wireless and secure
wireless and secure
hmm, i'm wondering how secure all of us are.. and if / what we use, so here's a little stupid poll
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
-
techjunkie
- Addict

- Posts: 1126
- Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:40 am
- Location: Sweden
- Contact:
-
Killswitch
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 731
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:12 pm
Well I've got a Wi-Fi set up that I only secure with a WEP access key. It doesn't really worry me much, the house to my left is empty and the one the the right has a family friend living it. The house directly opposite (my aunties) can get a very weak signal (in her front room) but apart from them there's not really any chance of anyone picking it up. I only really wanted encryption in case someone got a new laptop and picked up my access piont - WEP is good enough for that.
~I see one problem with your reasoning: the fact is thats not a chicken~
-
DarkDragon
- Addict

- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
-
Killswitch
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 731
- Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 7:12 pm
That's my point DarkDragon - if someone really wanted to get into my network they would. But since I don't owe the Maffia any money, nor have I annoyed any Russian hackers WEP is good enough to keep people off it who stumble accross it (which, in my opinion, is the biggest threat to a network).
~I see one problem with your reasoning: the fact is thats not a chicken~
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog

- Posts: 8452
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
The really big worry is that people who trade in kiddie porn have learned to drive around in a van through residential neighborhoods and park at the curb when they find a good signal. They do their trading from YOUR ip address and they don't get caught. But you could face a serious accusation for something you had no knowledge of or involvement in.
BERESHEIT
-
DarkDragon
- Addict

- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
IIRC the mac-address is written into the routerlog. And faking the mac-address is really hard, because it's hardwaredependent. So if your mac-address of your network cards isn't in the log, someone else was in your network.netmaestro wrote:The really big worry is that people who trade in kiddie porn have learned to drive around in a van through residential neighborhoods and park at the curb when they find a good signal. They do their trading from YOUR ip address and they don't get caught. But you could face a serious accusation for something you had no knowledge of or involvement in.
[EDIT]
And I am living in a village(3000 is the population count) where I've only noticed one new WLAN Infrastructure in my neighbourhood, and that's called "Fritz WLAN Box Fon", so maybe it's just a telephone(The word "Fon" sounds like "Phone" in German).
bye,
Daniel
Daniel
- netmaestro
- PureBasic Bullfrog

- Posts: 8452
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2005 5:42 am
- Location: Fort Nelson, BC, Canada
-
DarkDragon
- Addict

- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
- Location: Germany
- Contact:
i have been playing around a bit with the router, and whilst being unprotected (for a moment) i noticed someone trying to get into the server... bleep bleep etc.
so... i'd better check on my neighbours
took me little time to switch on all safeguards...
but... why i was running for a while 'unprotected'? speed...
i noticed enormous differences between different wifi devices... i have a linksys wrt54g router (65 bucks, no mimo pre-n or whatsoever) with wap2 aes protection
in combination with a dell laptop's onboard wifi, speed's approx 200 kb/sec, from 25 cm to 10 meters, signal max quality, no prob, speed's higher than needed and browsing works without a hitch, i don't even notice that i'm running wireless when online (haven't tried games though, but some tests show that it just may work, assuming it survives latency issues (ping times looked promising))
but when using a linksys pcmcia card (in another laptop) things are not so good, it appears reception signal is way worse, quite interesting but pretty disappointing, as the card and the base station are the same brand
i'll try to get that pcmcia card running in the same laptop to see if the machine is the issue, but the difference in reported signal reception were startling...
should i try a different pcmcia card / type / brand? anybody any suggestions?
so... i'd better check on my neighbours
but... why i was running for a while 'unprotected'? speed...
i noticed enormous differences between different wifi devices... i have a linksys wrt54g router (65 bucks, no mimo pre-n or whatsoever) with wap2 aes protection
in combination with a dell laptop's onboard wifi, speed's approx 200 kb/sec, from 25 cm to 10 meters, signal max quality, no prob, speed's higher than needed and browsing works without a hitch, i don't even notice that i'm running wireless when online (haven't tried games though, but some tests show that it just may work, assuming it survives latency issues (ping times looked promising))
but when using a linksys pcmcia card (in another laptop) things are not so good, it appears reception signal is way worse, quite interesting but pretty disappointing, as the card and the base station are the same brand
i'll try to get that pcmcia card running in the same laptop to see if the machine is the issue, but the difference in reported signal reception were startling...
should i try a different pcmcia card / type / brand? anybody any suggestions?
( PB6.00 LTS Win11 x64 Asrock AB350 Pro4 Ryzen 5 3600 32GB GTX1060 6GB - upgrade incoming...)
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )
( The path to enlightenment and the PureBasic Survival Guide right here... )

