All PBOSL Libraries and Droopy LIB in version 4.0. When ?

Everything else that doesn't fall into one of the other PB categories.
User avatar
cabaptista
User
User
Posts: 86
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2003 11:42 pm
Location: Lisboa, Portugal

All PBOSL Libraries and Droopy LIB in version 4.0. When ?

Post by cabaptista »

Guys,

When can we have all the PBOSL Libraries and the Droopy LIB working at full with PureBasic 4.0 ?

I'm working hard on that LIBS, making applications and i would like to start working with version 4.0.

Dates ? Maybe in April ? Or May ? :D :D :D

Please Guys, give us some feedback because yor LIBS are great and we need to start coding on next generation of Purebasic. :wink: :wink: :wink:
User avatar
Fangbeast
PureBasic Protozoa
PureBasic Protozoa
Posts: 4792
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: Not Sydney!!! (Bad water, no goats)

Re: All PBOSL Libraries and Droopy LIB in version 4.0. When

Post by Fangbeast »

cabaptista wrote:Guys,

When can we have all the PBOSL Libraries and the Droopy LIB working at full with PureBasic 4.0 ?

I'm working hard on that LIBS, making applications and i would like to start working with version 4.0.

Dates ? Maybe in April ? Or May ? :D :D :D

Please Guys, give us some feedback because yor LIBS are great and we need to start coding on next generation of Purebasic. :wink: :wink: :wink:
1. Check purearea.net. It has links to the PBOSL and *most* of them are already 4.00 compatible. Not only that, they provide FULL source code so you can fix problems yourself and not be dependant on broken libraries.

2. Droopy's lib also provides FULL source code so once again, you can change the code to suit v4.00 syntax.

You don't have to use libs, just use the source and include it as you would any other procedure and modify the syntax for v4. so you don't have to wait.

Why not try it?
Amateur Radio/VK3HAF, (D-STAR/DMR and more), Arduino, ESP32, Coding, Crochet
dagcrack
Addict
Addict
Posts: 1868
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 8:47 am
Location: Argentina
Contact:

Post by dagcrack »

Yes if you can use code, go for it. That way you'll really just compile what you need (by commenting out what you DONT need) and therefore whenever you have to change anything, you wont have to recompile a lib (be it splitted if you wanted to save space though, however.... You'll just waste some time to get things right, and then compile, etc).. Save yourself some time and use code when provided / possible.

By the way, what's the joy of Droopy lib ??
! Black holes are where God divided by zero !
My little blog!
(Not for the faint hearted!)
User avatar
Droopy
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 658
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:50 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Droopy »

Waiting for Tailbite v4
El_Choni
TailBite Expert
TailBite Expert
Posts: 1007
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 6:09 pm
Location: Spain

Post by El_Choni »

Droopy: have you tried the version at Purearea?
El_Choni
User avatar
Droopy
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 658
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 9:50 pm
Location: France
Contact:

Post by Droopy »

No, i wait for optionnal parameters in tailbite like PB4.
DarkDragon
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2347
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DarkDragon »

Droopy wrote:No, i wait for optionnal parameters in tailbite like PB4.
What do you mean?

ProcedureDLL TailBiteFunc(a.l)
ProcedureDLL TailBiteFunc2(a.l, b.l)

should do:
TailBiteFunc2(a.l[, b.l])

like it always did.
bye,
Daniel
Post Reply