Which Tracker to use
Which Tracker to use
Hello,
I've made this nice little scramble remake. When you have the time, please check it out and tell me how it runs on your system.
Now I want to put some music in the game and I saw that it is possible to use modules. I don't have any experience with modules but I read that you have to get a Tracker.
My question is: What's the best and easy to use Tracker?
Thanks!
I've made this nice little scramble remake. When you have the time, please check it out and tell me how it runs on your system.
Now I want to put some music in the game and I saw that it is possible to use modules. I don't have any experience with modules but I read that you have to get a Tracker.
My question is: What's the best and easy to use Tracker?
Thanks!
Wikipedia offers quite a good overview:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackers
Apart from tracked music just not being of any big use nowadays,
my personal recommendation would be Fasttracker, Impulsetracker
or any of the newer incarnations, like Buzz or MadTracker.
They all do work the same so it's mostly a matter of personal preference
and the engine you're about to use in order to play the tracked music
later on in your program.
The classic .mod-Format for instance is being played by every player,
.xm (Fasttracker) or .it (Impulsetracker) are different (more channels,
more effect-instructions, etc.).
Once you know how to track, it doesn't really matter what tracker you're
using.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trackers
Apart from tracked music just not being of any big use nowadays,
my personal recommendation would be Fasttracker, Impulsetracker
or any of the newer incarnations, like Buzz or MadTracker.
They all do work the same so it's mostly a matter of personal preference
and the engine you're about to use in order to play the tracked music
later on in your program.
The classic .mod-Format for instance is being played by every player,
.xm (Fasttracker) or .it (Impulsetracker) are different (more channels,
more effect-instructions, etc.).
Once you know how to track, it doesn't really matter what tracker you're
using.
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
-
- Enthusiast
- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:50 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
- Contact:
Why not using a modular soundtracker ? Oldschools soundtrackers were very good but now, we could do much without breaking the compatibility with the old ones.
What is a modular soundtracker ? Keep the gui/layout of old soundtrackers and add vst/vsti plugins support, better sound rendering, more midi control, more effect, kickass filter (lpf, hpf, biquad and so on ...), asio/dsound, better resampling (fir, polyphase, spline ...) ...
Just to name a few :
- Psycle : this is the one i use, very easy to use when the concept is understood, it will have a very good module import soon through sampulse (a native plugin),
- Buzz : the father of modular soundtrackers, i don't like it's sequencing mecanism but buzz machines are very goods !
- Skale : a copy of Fastracker (at least, it's spirit), well programming and rock solid stable, it also works with linux,
- Renoise : the dark side of Skale, it is the "same" thing but you will have to pay to get advances feature ...,
- Buzzle : a wip project wich is meant to be a buzz replacement with the better sound ever heard and a lot of other things,
- BeroTracker : not very popular but a very good piece of tracker, it is something like modplug tracker but with a very good sound reproduction (at least with modules).
Hope this helps.
What is a modular soundtracker ? Keep the gui/layout of old soundtrackers and add vst/vsti plugins support, better sound rendering, more midi control, more effect, kickass filter (lpf, hpf, biquad and so on ...), asio/dsound, better resampling (fir, polyphase, spline ...) ...
Just to name a few :
- Psycle : this is the one i use, very easy to use when the concept is understood, it will have a very good module import soon through sampulse (a native plugin),
- Buzz : the father of modular soundtrackers, i don't like it's sequencing mecanism but buzz machines are very goods !
- Skale : a copy of Fastracker (at least, it's spirit), well programming and rock solid stable, it also works with linux,
- Renoise : the dark side of Skale, it is the "same" thing but you will have to pay to get advances feature ...,
- Buzzle : a wip project wich is meant to be a buzz replacement with the better sound ever heard and a lot of other things,
- BeroTracker : not very popular but a very good piece of tracker, it is something like modplug tracker but with a very good sound reproduction (at least with modules).
Hope this helps.
Hi 
Psycle is very easy to use, the basic concept is just to interconnect module between each other using the SHIFT + LEFT MOUSE to a gear (wich can be a vst(i), native plugin), after that, another thing to know is the tweak command wich is only a command effect telling Psycle to move the knob number x to the value y of the z gear.
If you know that, you know how Psycle works

Psycle is very easy to use, the basic concept is just to interconnect module between each other using the SHIFT + LEFT MOUSE to a gear (wich can be a vst(i), native plugin), after that, another thing to know is the tweak command wich is only a command effect telling Psycle to move the knob number x to the value y of the z gear.
If you know that, you know how Psycle works

- the.weavster
- Addict
- Posts: 1576
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2003 6:53 pm
- Location: England
It amazes me how much interest there still is in trackers. I would have thought programs like Orion, FruityLoops and Making Waves would have killed them off.
There is something quite hypnotic about watching the patterns fly by on the screen, especially with a really good-looking tracker like Renoise. I think I enjoy that more than the music...
There is something quite hypnotic about watching the patterns fly by on the screen, especially with a really good-looking tracker like Renoise. I think I enjoy that more than the music...
- Psychophanta
- Always Here
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Anare
- Contact:
Ohhh!, I stoled lots of coins of my mom's bag to play Scramble :roll:
I was a blind vicious with that Arcade game!
By the way of trackers, i strongly advise ModPlug, it is totally free and it catch all the Karsten Obarsky brothers and clones: SoundTracker, Impulse Tracker, FastTracker, etc.
You must pay to use some Psycle features, but ModPlug is easy, simple, totally free, and veeeeery powerful.
I was a blind vicious with that Arcade game!
By the way of trackers, i strongly advise ModPlug, it is totally free and it catch all the Karsten Obarsky brothers and clones: SoundTracker, Impulse Tracker, FastTracker, etc.
You must pay to use some Psycle features, but ModPlug is easy, simple, totally free, and veeeeery powerful.
- Psychophanta
- Always Here
- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Anare
- Contact:
I tried to use it, but it needs VST plugins which are not free.KarLKoX wrote:Psycle is totally free, better, it is under GNU GPL.
Because it improves a lotKarLKoX wrote:I don't like the view of Modplug Tracker, it is so much "a la windows" and break MOD/S3M/XM/IT by adding it's own feature like stereo samples and others things.
