Is your Desktop bigger than 640x480?

For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...

Is your Desktop bigger than 640x480?

Yes
76
97%
No
2
3%
 
Total votes: 78

PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Is your Desktop bigger than 640x480?

Post by PB »

My app uses a 640x480 window, because I want it to display on all PCs with
no problems, but now it's running out of display space due to new features
that I've added that I must have instantly-viewable (ie. without switching to
another Panel tab).

So I'm thinking maybe it's better to have my window as 700x550 minimum,
but I'm concerned this may be a problem for 640x480 users. But then again,
how many people run their Desktop at that size anyway? So, please vote so
I can get a general idea if using 700x550 would be okay. Thanks! :)
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
User avatar
ts-soft
Always Here
Always Here
Posts: 5756
Joined: Thu Jun 24, 2004 2:44 pm
Location: Berlin - Germany

Post by ts-soft »

I use 1152 x 864, it's the highest for 100 hz on my Monitor.
PureBasic 5.73 | SpiderBasic 2.30 | Windows 10 Pro (x64) | Linux Mint 20.1 (x64)
Old bugs good, new bugs bad! Updates are evil: might fix old bugs and introduce no new ones.
Image
User avatar
Fangbeast
PureBasic Protozoa
PureBasic Protozoa
Posts: 4791
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 3:08 pm
Location: Not Sydney!!! (Bad water, no goats)

Post by Fangbeast »

I've been using 1024x768 for as long as I can remember. Any larger and my old eyes can't cope.

Can't honestly remember the last time I saw anyone using anything smaller. Not for at least 6 years.
Amateur Radio/VK3HAF, (D-STAR/DMR and more), Arduino, ESP32, Coding, Crochet
coma
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 164
Joined: Fri Aug 15, 2003 3:46 am
Location: Canada

Post by coma »

Nobody uses 640x480 anymore ("nobody" = less than 1% :wink: )

http://www.thecounter.com/stats/2006/January/res.php
http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp

use 800x600 as the minimum desktop resolution.
Intrigued
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 501
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2005 3:55 am
Location: U.S.A.

Post by Intrigued »

I run 1400x1050 on this 15" LCD screened laptop.

*Pack all the junk you can on the little screen. I should just unpack (from my move) one of my desktop systems that uses a decent SamSung 19" LCD, but hey, that would take great effort and patience. ;)*
Intrigued - Registered PureBasic, lifetime updates user
User avatar
Airr
User
User
Posts: 49
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 4:29 am
Contact:

Post by Airr »

The people I know who don't run at 1024x768 or higher run at 800x600. Anything smaller, and web browsing becomes an adventure.

I'm at 1024x768 at home, and 1280x1024 at work.

AIR.
"Programming is like Poetry. Sometimes the words just escape you..." -me, to my manager.
Dare2
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 3321
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 3:55 am
Location: Great Southern Land

Post by Dare2 »

I think 800x600 is pretty safe, but I stick to 640x480 for my own non-resizable windows.

When it gets cluttered I use a hidegadget()/disablegadget() approach and some buttons so users can see a section. Bit like panels but without the panelgadget. Click a button, all gadgets are hidden and then those needed for this view are shown.

Also you can use scrollarea.

Do this because of the noisy minority (The adventurous < 1%) :)
@}--`--,-- A rose by any other name ..
Baldrick
Addict
Addict
Posts: 860
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 6:49 pm
Location: Australia

Post by Baldrick »

1024 x 768 @ 19" here as my eyes strain a little too much any higher.
Eyes just not what they used to be I guess..... :P
Agree with Dare2, 800 x 600 pretty safe, but noisy minority (The adventurous < 1%) will always be there. :roll:
Bonne_den_kule
Addict
Addict
Posts: 841
Joined: Mon Jun 07, 2004 7:10 pm

Post by Bonne_den_kule »

1280x1024 @ 17'
DarkDragon
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2345
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2003 9:16 am
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by DarkDragon »

1024x768x32 @ 12.1"
bye,
Daniel
venom
User
User
Posts: 56
Joined: Fri Jul 25, 2003 1:54 pm
Location: Australia

Post by venom »

1280x1024 here
PB
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 7581
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:24 pm

Post by PB »

> I use a hidegadget()/disablegadget() approach

Yeah, but there comes a point (in my app anyway) where I want to see all
the items all of the time. :) I can't afford to hide any of them, otherwise I
lose productivity switching PanelTabs or clicking to hide gadgets. So that's
why I've gone for a bigger window, and bad luck to any 640x480 users. :P
(Besides, the only time I see 640x480 is if I have to boot into Safe Mode).
I compile using 5.31 (x86) on Win 7 Ultimate (64-bit).
"PureBasic won't be object oriented, period" - Fred.
User avatar
einander
Enthusiast
Enthusiast
Posts: 744
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2003 2:09 am
Location: Spain (Galicia)

Post by einander »

1280 x 1024 x 32
freak
PureBasic Team
PureBasic Team
Posts: 5944
Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2003 5:21 pm
Location: Germany

Post by freak »

2560x1024 :D
quidquid Latine dictum sit altum videtur
traumatic
PureBasic Expert
PureBasic Expert
Posts: 1661
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2003 4:41 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Post by traumatic »

Haha, just like in school: "Mine is bigger than yours!" :D

(2x 1280x1024 ;) )
Good programmers don't comment their code. It was hard to write, should be hard to read.
Post Reply