just after beta17 !jbernard13 wrote:Please fred
with when the final version?
PureBasic 4.00 - Beta 3
- Psychophanta
- Always Here

- Posts: 5153
- Joined: Wed Jun 11, 2003 9:33 pm
- Location: Anare
- Contact:
- Michael Vogel
- Addict

- Posts: 2864
- Joined: Thu Feb 09, 2006 11:27 pm
- Contact:
Beta3,...
Thanks also,
any roadmap which changes could be seen in the near future?
Are there any main areas where the most work will be done, like...
... bug fixes (of course)
... integer function enhancements (like abs, mod, div, scale, pred, succ, inc, dec,...)
... other things (do while / loop until, QuickSin, QuickCos, Floor, Ceil,...)
... ide enhancements (more speed, bold names, better autocomplete, autocase for variables, alternative shortcut settings,...)
... directory structure for the PureBasic package (example sources divided in categories, etc.)
Michael
any roadmap which changes could be seen in the near future?
Are there any main areas where the most work will be done, like...
... bug fixes (of course)
... integer function enhancements (like abs, mod, div, scale, pred, succ, inc, dec,...)
... other things (do while / loop until, QuickSin, QuickCos, Floor, Ceil,...)
... ide enhancements (more speed, bold names, better autocomplete, autocase for variables, alternative shortcut settings,...)
... directory structure for the PureBasic package (example sources divided in categories, etc.)
Michael
Yes, it's correct, as you can retrieve anything in string form. Tough, it's advised to use the specialised function for speed and may be for compatibility, as it's not granted than a database stores floating number in exactly the same format than another (dot instead of coma, use of exponent character etc.).jqn wrote:Hi,all runs fine now.Added GetDatabaseDouble()/Quad(), any tests on these commands are welcome
But, in tests I've noted that GetDatabase[Long/Float/Double/Quad]() are equivalent to GetDatabaseString() combined with (followed by) Val/ValF/ValD/ValQ().
Is correct this?.
-
Hatonastick
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 149
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2005 11:50 am
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
- Contact:
- Hroudtwolf
- Addict

- Posts: 803
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:35 am
- Location: Germany(Hessen)
- Contact:
Hello Fred,
The BETA 3 has a lot of problems with memory accesses.
Often, I get a "invalid memory access"-errormessage if I write two or more allocatememories in next to another.
And the same problem is sometimes, if I call PeekS with a stringpointer more than one times in next to another.
And in other sources, the same codes works perfectly.
The BETA 3 has a lot of problems with memory accesses.
Often, I get a "invalid memory access"-errormessage if I write two or more allocatememories in next to another.
And the same problem is sometimes, if I call PeekS with a stringpointer more than one times in next to another.
And in other sources, the same codes works perfectly.
-
dontmailme
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:35 am
I get same memory access problem.
It seems to be random ?! But if you remove the offending line, or comment it, the message appears at the next line above!!!
It's obviously a programming error, further down in the code.... but the IDE/Compiler isn't showing the problem!
If I get it with a small example I'll post the code
It seems to be random ?! But if you remove the offending line, or comment it, the message appears at the next line above!!!
It's obviously a programming error, further down in the code.... but the IDE/Compiler isn't showing the problem!
If I get it with a small example I'll post the code
Paid up PB User !
-
dontmailme
- Enthusiast

- Posts: 537
- Joined: Wed Oct 29, 2003 10:35 am


