Purebasic review and interview with creator:
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by WolfgangS.
Doh! I forgot the address ... bssssssss
http://www.allbasiccode.com/downloads/purebasic.rtf
MFG
WolfgangS
Doh! I forgot the address ... bssssssss
http://www.allbasiccode.com/downloads/purebasic.rtf
MFG
WolfgangS
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by Berikco.
There are only two negative points: the use of 'Gadget' and sometimes a function changes name or is completely removed, like ReceiveNetworkString().
But there is no date in this review, and no version number, could be version 2.95.
The date the webserver returns for this file is Sat, 11 may 2002 13:46:55 GMT, so he tested 3.00 or 3.10
A lot of functions where removed in those versions...
Me also to had to get used to 'gadget' but this takes only couple of weeks
Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be
There are only two negative points: the use of 'Gadget' and sometimes a function changes name or is completely removed, like ReceiveNetworkString().
But there is no date in this review, and no version number, could be version 2.95.
The date the webserver returns for this file is Sat, 11 may 2002 13:46:55 GMT, so he tested 3.00 or 3.10
A lot of functions where removed in those versions...
Me also to had to get used to 'gadget' but this takes only couple of weeks

Regards,
Berikco
http://www.benny.zeb.be
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by tinman.
The VPlanet interview was quite interesting. However, the AllBasicCode "review" was quite poor. Really, no offence to whoever wrote it, but a single side of A4 which makes points about minor things (naming of commands) and does not actually investigate the capabilities or purposes of the languages is not a review.
Has there been a review of PB in the mainstream press in any country?
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.
(Win98first ed. + SP1, PB3.30)
The VPlanet interview was quite interesting. However, the AllBasicCode "review" was quite poor. Really, no offence to whoever wrote it, but a single side of A4 which makes points about minor things (naming of commands) and does not actually investigate the capabilities or purposes of the languages is not a review.
Has there been a review of PB in the mainstream press in any country?
--
It's not minimalist - I'm increasing efficiency by reducing input effort.
(Win98first ed. + SP1, PB3.30)
-
- PureBasic Guru
- Posts: 16777133
- Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2003 7:42 pm
Restored from previous forum. Originally posted by PB.
> a single side of A4 which makes points about minor things (naming
> of commands) and does not actually investigate the capabilities or
> purposes of the languages is not a review.
Exactly right. The so-called "reviewer" is an inexperienced fool.
PB - Registered PureBasic Coder
> a single side of A4 which makes points about minor things (naming
> of commands) and does not actually investigate the capabilities or
> purposes of the languages is not a review.
Exactly right. The so-called "reviewer" is an inexperienced fool.
PB - Registered PureBasic Coder