For everything that's not in any way related to PureBasic. General chat etc...
josku_x
Addict
Posts: 997 Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:08 pm
Post
by josku_x » Tue Dec 13, 2005 3:47 pm
Is oracle easy to use with PB? Looked in CodeArchiv and in these forums about Oracle, nothing surprising yet,.
Straker
Enthusiast
Posts: 701 Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Location: Idaho, USA
Post
by Straker » Tue Dec 13, 2005 7:02 pm
Should be no problem with ODBC. Oracle uses its own OCI.DLL for a native interface (I haven't seen a PB wrapper yet).
Oracle is a very powerful but complex database with its own SQL dialect, so unless you are writing a major multi-user database, there are easier solutions.
josku_x
Addict
Posts: 997 Joined: Sat Sep 24, 2005 2:08 pm
Post
by josku_x » Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:23 pm
Still surprising that oracle 10g express edition beta is so huge, not even the final MySQL is that large. Must be good anyway,
Straker
Enthusiast
Posts: 701 Joined: Wed Apr 13, 2005 10:45 pm
Location: Idaho, USA
Post
by Straker » Tue Dec 13, 2005 8:51 pm
Oh yes, Oracle is a pig.
rsts
Addict
Posts: 2736 Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 8:39 am
Location: Southwest OH - USA
Post
by rsts » Wed Dec 14, 2005 1:30 am
Company I worked for uses Oracle for processing multiple terabyte data bases containing billions of transactions (call detail records).
For that type of volume and size it was about the only game in town.
For databases most of us mortals will be building/accessing, it's probably unnecessary complexity.
cheers
techjunkie
Addict
Posts: 1126 Joined: Wed Oct 15, 2003 12:40 am
Location: Sweden
Contact:
Post
by techjunkie » Thu Dec 15, 2005 10:18 pm
rsts wrote: For that type of volume and size it was about the only game in town.
I agree - when MS SQL fails or for databases that are 500 GB or more, we switch to Oracle (on Unix).
(\__/)
(='.'=) This is Bunny. Copy and paste Bunny into your
(")_(") signature to help him gain world domination.