blablabla my a$$..!
really.
you also post pointless things! Wich is far more pointless than this!
But you're starting to forget the codes.. You shouldnt take it seriously.
No I didnt said the thread was pointless because I cant say it I've posted worst things so I'd be a hipocrit maggot, however what I said - if you read carefully - is that this kind of exe wouldnt be any usefull. The idea of a challenge would more likely to be that you'll have to develop a software with some set rules and the smallest exe wins. (smallest uncompressed and compressed, compression allowed= UPX).
That was all I said.
! Black holes are where God divided by zero ! My little blog! (Not for the faint hearted!)
uhmm the great thing about my exe was that it was written in purebasic without inline assembly!
if i wanted to write the smallest possible exe i would do it in assembler. Come with one that is smaller wich is written in purebasic! of course its possible i only used the little winapi as possible
thefool wrote:uhmm the great thing about my exe was that it was written in purebasic without inline assembly!
if i wanted to write the smallest possible exe i would do it in assembler. Come with one that is smaller wich is written in purebasic! of course its possible i only used the little winapi as possible
Hmm, I don't remember you said anything about that. What do you meant by "as little api as possible?".
thefool wrote:uhmm the great thing about my exe was that it was written in purebasic without inline assembly!
if i wanted to write the smallest possible exe i would do it in assembler. Come with one that is smaller wich is written in purebasic! of course its possible i only used the little winapi as possible
Hmm, I don't remember you said anything about that. What do you meant by "as little api as possible?".
Trond has some problem following rules :roll: - Hes a rocker... "don't tell me what to do you motha f****"
! Black holes are where God divided by zero ! My little blog! (Not for the faint hearted!)
i hate you!
)