These boards are pretty active!

Post by **Dare2** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 4:09 pm

I have been cruising between various boards, catching up. These forums almost always have one or more new posts by the time I cycle back to here. More than the others combined, I think.

You really wanted to know that.

dagcrack · Post by **dagcrack** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 9:08 pm

And you really wanted your post count to grow, DIDNT YOU???!!
Yes they are quite active - that makes them attractive (hey that sounds good).

dracflamloc · Post by **dracflamloc** » Sat Sep 17, 2005 11:30 pm

I'm sexually active...

Post by **Dare2** » Sun Sep 18, 2005 1:04 am

lol@dracflamloc. * keeps a safe distance *

@dagcrack. Yeppers (+1). That post was pure poetry.

dagcrack · Post by **dagcrack** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:05 pm

I'm sexually active...

Your poor hand is

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Mon Sep 19, 2005 6:51 pm

dracflamloc wrote:I'm sexually active...

Some others are sexually dead or almost, you can be sure

Fou-Lu · Post by **Fou-Lu** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:30 pm

dracflamloc wrote:I'm sexually active...

Do not forget that. And look for a psycoanalist, normal people don't feel the need to say that, unless they aren't sure about their sexuality...

thefool · Post by **thefool** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:41 pm

normal people dont post pictures of c*ndoms in a programming forum

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:43 pm

Who is able here to define "normal people"

dracflamloc · Post by **dracflamloc** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:50 pm

Well... excuse me for being sexually active!

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:54 pm

Don't worry, you must no request excuses, coz you are explicit, and "sexually activity" falls into "normal people" definition.
And people who is not sexually active fall into deficient (below normal) people.

thefool · Post by **thefool** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 8:58 pm

Psychophanta wrote:Don't worry, you must no request excuses, coz you are explicit, and "sexually activity" falls into "normal people" definition.
And people who is not sexually active fall into deficient (below normal) people.

below normal?
i belive "normal" cant be determined in this point. :roll:

Psychophanta · Post by **Psychophanta** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:00 pm

Well, i referred "normal" in a biological and medical point of view.

thefool · Post by **thefool** » Tue Sep 20, 2005 9:14 pm

uhm so not normal in a human way?
sorry i dont get your point.. :roll:

dagcrack · Post by **dagcrack** » Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:36 am

You are all unhumanly hand solos!
This is offtopic, normal persons doesnt post here.
Im just here to mention that! *goes away*

Nice condoms..

We artists use that kind of condoms, let your imagination flow!

Now I'm darthvader, *takes out light_saber_* and im going to fight against the big tit ship!