Possible bug.
Posted: Wed Jun 04, 2025 12:17 am
Should it be considered a bug if I'm doing some testing on programs. I run a test program that does something, lets say it works out values of PI and draws them to screen (anything that can continue forever), something that does not end. Then I stop the program and amend it to Print out via Serial Port, all values of PI (anything that can continue forever).
I then, while the latest program is printing via serial port, save that program as a different name, so that I can go and open the old program that only drew them to screen.
I then open the old program, and find that the Kill Program red X is already red - even though I didn't run it yet, and PB thinks it is already running, but PB also thinks (knows, because I did run it) that the new program printing via Serial Port is already running because the Red "Kill Program" X is also live on that program.
I then Kill the program that does not print to serial port, but both programs end.
I would consider that a bug, given that we use these programs to test things, run test programs and save from them, it seems like it shouldn't do that.
What do you think?
I then, while the latest program is printing via serial port, save that program as a different name, so that I can go and open the old program that only drew them to screen.
I then open the old program, and find that the Kill Program red X is already red - even though I didn't run it yet, and PB thinks it is already running, but PB also thinks (knows, because I did run it) that the new program printing via Serial Port is already running because the Red "Kill Program" X is also live on that program.
I then Kill the program that does not print to serial port, but both programs end.
I would consider that a bug, given that we use these programs to test things, run test programs and save from them, it seems like it shouldn't do that.
What do you think?