equivalent of c strings in pure basic
Posted: Mon Jul 15, 2024 2:52 am
Hello,
It's been a while since using this language, so I apologize if this is a silly question, but I can't find immediately available information regarding this.
I'm calling a DLL from pure basic. In this instance, I need to use char* as parameters and sometimes as the return value of procedures as well. Should I use .s for this or something else?
Is this legal or do alternative methods need to be used?
In conclusion: what is pb's direct equivalent of c's char* when calling functions from a c dll?
Thanks,
Rory Michie.
It's been a while since using this language, so I apologize if this is a silly question, but I can't find immediately available information regarding this.
I'm calling a DLL from pure basic. In this instance, I need to use char* as parameters and sometimes as the return value of procedures as well. Should I use .s for this or something else?
Is this legal or do alternative methods need to be used?
In conclusion: what is pb's direct equivalent of c's char* when calling functions from a c dll?
Thanks,
Rory Michie.