PureBasic Forums - English

Posted: **Wed May 10, 2023 4:50 am**

code like

h$ = "this"+
     "that"+
     "there"

Indentation works as expected

Now try with

Code: Select all

ProcedureReturn "this"+
"that"+
"there"

the continuation does not indent.

Posted: **Wed May 10, 2023 8:49 am**

You are the master of bug reports!

Posted: **Wed May 10, 2023 2:10 pm**

Caronte3D wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 8:49 am You are the master of bug reports!

Not sure about that. a lot of what I consider bugs are not.

I just noticed it does work if you do

Code: Select all

procedurereturn( "this"+

(the added '(' seems to trigger indentation properly)

Posted: **Wed May 10, 2023 4:12 pm**

works for me (asm and с compiler)

Code: Select all

Procedure.s FuncName()
    ProcedureReturn "this"+
      "that"+
      "there"
EndProcedure

Debug FuncName()

Posted: **Wed May 10, 2023 5:04 pm**

AZJIO wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 4:12 pm works for me (asm and с compiler)
Code: Select all
Procedure.s FuncName()
    ProcedureReturn "this"+
      "that"+
      "there"
EndProcedure

Debug FuncName()

Maybe it's IDE dependent (I'm using 6.02b3) -- but the indentation doesn't look right. it should be under "this"
Just to be clear, it's not that the code doesn't work - it's that the ide doesn't indent the continuation.

Posted: **Fri May 12, 2023 11:44 am**

jassing wrote: Wed May 10, 2023 5:04 pm Maybe it's IDE dependent (I'm using 6.02b3) -- but the indentation doesn't look right. it should be under "this"
Just to be clear, it's not that the code doesn't work - it's that the ide doesn't indent the continuation.

The ide DOES indent the continuation. The issue is it shout NOT indent but should align this line.

Posted: **Sun May 14, 2023 10:15 pm**

Fixed: https://github.com/fantaisie-software/p ... c/pull/234

Posted: **Wed May 17, 2023 10:41 am**

Thanks for the one line fix !

PureBasic Forums - English

[Done] line continuation inconsistency

[Done] line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency

Re: line continuation inconsistency