[6.01 B1] x64 thinks is x86 [NO BUG]

Just starting out? Need help? Post your questions and find answers here.
User avatar
luis
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3876
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Italy

[6.01 B1] x64 thinks is x86 [NO BUG]

Post by luis »

Sorry, my mistake.

I selected the wrong compiler (x86 instead of x64) when adding it inside the interface... the name was too long and the "x86" was out of view. Plus I'm tired.

Code: Select all

CompilerIf #PB_Compiler_Backend = #PB_Backend_C
 CompilerIf #PB_Compiler_Processor = #PB_Processor_x86
  Debug "x86"
 CompilerElse   
  Debug "x64"
 CompilerEndIf 
CompilerEndIf
The x64 compiler with the C backend in 6.01 B1 prints "x86" instead of "x64"
Tested on Win 10.

// Moved from "Bugs - C backend" to "Coding Questions" (Kiffi)
Last edited by luis on Sat Jan 28, 2023 12:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again ?"
A little PureBasic review
User avatar
StarBootics
Addict
Addict
Posts: 984
Joined: Sun Jul 07, 2013 11:35 am
Location: Canada

Re: [6.01 B1] x64 thinks is x86

Post by StarBootics »

Work as expected under Linux, the debugger output is X64.

Best regards
StarBootics
The Stone Age did not end due to a shortage of stones !
User avatar
STARGÅTE
Addict
Addict
Posts: 2067
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 1:30 pm
Location: Germany, Glienicke
Contact:

Re: [6.01 B1] x64 thinks is x86

Post by STARGÅTE »

Compiler = PureBasic 6.01 LTS beta 1 - C Backend (Windows - x64)
x64
PB 6.01 ― Win 10, 21H2 ― Ryzen 9 3900X, 32 GB ― NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 ― Vivaldi 6.0 ― www.unionbytes.de
Lizard - Script language for symbolic calculations and moreTypeface - Sprite-based font include/module
User avatar
luis
Addict
Addict
Posts: 3876
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 11:09 pm
Location: Italy

Re: [6.01 B1] x64 thinks is x86 [NO BUG]

Post by luis »

I'm a little idiotic.
I was certain I was using the 64 bit version instead it was just the IDE that was 64 bit with the wrong compiler.
See first post.
"Have you tried turning it off and on again ?"
A little PureBasic review
Post Reply