Page 1 of 1
License of LCC-Win32
Posted: Wed Oct 15, 2003 2:40 pm
by helpy
Quote of the Library SDK - ReadMe.txt:
Code: Select all
... Lcc32 is a freeware C compiler, with an integrated IDE
which produce very good code. You can get the lastest version to:
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/
License on
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32/ :
Code: Select all
License:
This software is not freeware, it is copyrighted by Jacob Navia.
It's free for non-commercial use, if you use it professionally
you have to have to buy a licence.
Professional use is:
* Related to business (e.g you use it in a corporation)
* If you sell you software.
I think this should be changed in the ReadMe of the Library SDK
cu, helpy
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 2:51 am
by sec
he(Ja) is also a french
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:32 am
by helpy
sec wrote:he(Ja) is also a french
???
???
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:44 pm
by Proteus
helpy wrote:sec wrote:he(Ja) is also a french
???
???
Translation: He (Jacob Navia) is also French.
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 1:53 pm
by LarsG
and...?!? what does him being french have anything to do with the lisence?
Posted: Thu Oct 16, 2003 8:33 pm
by Karbon
Don't you know? The French are in a conspiracy to confuse the shit out of all of us ! ahhh!
Re: License of LCC-Win32
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:09 am
by PB
> I think this should be changed in the ReadMe of the Library SDK
What's this got to do with the discussion of PureBasic?
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 11:16 am
by Inner
Just a little 'Lcc' linker PB uses.. nothing major.. <sarcasm>
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 4:33 pm
by Fred
I've of course a licensed version of LccLnk for redistribution...
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 4:56 pm
by helpy
Fred wrote:I've of course a licensed version of LccLnk for redistribution...
I was sure about that ... but the information in the readme is still wrong.
Posted: Fri Oct 17, 2003 7:26 pm
by Fred
Sure, I will change it.
Posted: Sat Oct 18, 2003 8:25 am
by PB
> > What's this got to do with the discussion of PureBasic?
>
> Just a little 'Lcc' linker PB uses.. nothing major.. <sarcasm>
Ah, I see. Now I understand the relevance.
